SABRES 0311

Murica! Your either with us or a Leafs fan. We will not bow to the Milbury and Edwards Axis of Evil. Surprised Toby Keith hasn’t already made a song about how awesome the Sabres and Bills are.

Isn’t that the issue though? They play down to the level of lesser competition. I remember that being a point of discussion last year.

I don’t know about that but on a cold night and enough whiskey who knows

Edwards is really passionate about the Bruins which clouds his objectivity. Milbury is a tool.

That top photo could be a good meme.

What is the matrix? Lolol. BTW being a good person doesn’t entail telling others how to live.

Not saying he sucks just that he made an incredibly stupid play.

Nice pass Captain Doofus

Two goals from the same area.

Here we go now here we go here we go!

Wow the guy who scored was being covered by Mitts. Hell yeah I’ll take that matchup.

I hope they pull something out of their *** next period. Mainly their heads.

DMen must want Linus in net. They keep screwing up they might get their wish.

A half second longer and Sam’s shot would’ve been a scoring chance instead of out of play.

Go big or go home.

I’d say unethical but not in violation of policies governing SCIF security. Now claiming that discussion contained classified information while knowingly using that excuse to hide the contents of that discussion from political opposition is a potential violation of policies. Guidelines are clear that one cannot classify something because it might be politically harmful. A discussion, document, media, so on would have to contain information which the unauthorized disclosure is reasonably expected to harm national security to warrant a classification. However someone could simply say they thought the discussion would reach that threshold or that the meeting deviated from what was planned.

Non SCIF areas can be used to store, process and discuss information. SCIFs can do the same but are for different stuff as well. Not sure what you mean by abuse. I mean if you are referring to whether or not it was an appropriate venue for the testimony it would rely on what they were discussing. Bringing electronic devices not cleared inside would be in violation. Recording is asking for iron bracelets.

SCIF: Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. In terms of national security someone brining in a listening device is a big deal.

SCIFs go beyond state laws. “Meanwhile, North Carolina Rep. Mark Walker tweeted: "UPDATE: We are in the SCIF and every GOP Member is quietly listening." And Georgia Rep. Buddy Carter wrote that "my Republican colleagues and I just stormed the impeachment hearing room and finally got in. Several lawmakers leaving the facility confirmed that multiple Republicans had brought their cellphones, even though electronics were not allowed. Fox News is told some Republican members removed their devices after being advised about the rules for the secure area by the House Sergeant at Arms. Rep. Alex Mooney, R-W.Va., even posted on Twitter what he called an audio "report from inside the SCIF."

Stopped reading after the part about a recording from inside. That pissed me off. Absolutely illegal. I don’t care who you are. That potentially compromises other information inside there.

If you don’t agree that’s fine. However I’m not going to change my view just because you don’t agree. Bottom line is I’m not owning the stupidity of white supremacists of the past. I’m not saying it wasn’t a poor choice of words. It just seems like people feel a white person should never use it. So again you live your life how you want and I will do the same.

Fair enough. You live your life how you want and I will mine.

So is this a playoff caliber team?

What was the SJS guy thinking? A blind pass to nobody that looked like a shot on his own net.

Jack should have a Hatty by now.