Jump to content

SABRES 0311

Members
  • Posts

    5,182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

8,202 profile views

SABRES 0311's Achievements

First Liner

First Liner (6/8)

2.1k

Reputation

  1. This is the funniest $*** I’ve seen. Win now mode, huh? Players didn’t get that memo, KA.
  2. That turnover can’t happen by our best player and captain.
  3. TT needs a playmaker on his line. This year he seems to be less of a dangle guy.
  4. Like I said it’s my speculation and I can’t prove it either way.
  5. I think all the questions you raise is why the EO won’t be upheld. Today it serves one purpose but tomorrow potentially it’s the foundation for some else. The speculation I have is that it’s not intended to be permanent but rather work in tandem with other directives. That’s a different conversation though regarding the cartels. Either way I can’t fathom this EO living beyond this term.
  6. The 2A analogy wasn’t meant to add directly to the 14A discussion other than the fact questioning application of amendments is a back and forth thing. IMO the EO is part of a much larger issue. Not just domestic but tying it into other EOs that came out. At that point it’s my speculation. Regarding this EO I am conflicted when looking at it as a stand alone directive.
  7. So what are some of the key things we are looking for given the team’s situation at this point? For me: -Tweaking the PP to find something viable for the rest of this year and maybe into next. -Getting a look at Patterson for an unlikely but, hey you never know trade. -Continued player evaluation to prioritize a core for next season. -Speculating whose out at the deadline given performance and value.
  8. The original application of the 14th amendment has been interpreted as if you are born here you are a citizen, period. The amount of time that interpretation been in effect sets a precedence that makes the survivability of this EO unlikely. I believe it’s there, in part, to establish a standard for what qualifies as citizenship. This further degrades the viability of the EO since a standard has already been established and maintained. In case you are looking for another perspective, Section 1 affirms the idea that if you are born here you are one of us, one people from diverse backgrounds. Oh, and I’m not trying to shift the conversation. I’m merely providing an example of how amendment application in modern times can and has been questioned. The 2A debate is one of the most recent and recurring examples. Therefore, the intent is to bridge a gap in ideologies to show it’s not a partisan thing. Relax. Try reading and asking for an explanation like an adult.
  9. Is that a rhetorical question? The Trump administration is going to have a hard time getting this upheld. The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 which means there’s almost 160 years of precedence for the original interpretation/application. On the other hand, the left has been the dominant political force for questioning modern day application of the second amendment. Not trying to shift the discussion away from the main point. Just saying it’s not unheard of to question how amendments apply to current sociopolitical situations. IMO I don’t think the EO stays. If it does it will be rescinded once the next liberal president takes office.
  10. EO https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/protecting-the-meaning-and-value-of-american-citizenship/ 14th Amendment https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-14/ How this reads it seems as long as one biological parent is a U.S. citizen then the child would be granted citizenship. If neither are a U.S. citizen then the child is not considered a U.S. citizen. The EO applies more stringent application of the 14th Amendment. Specifically, it defines what must already exist (parental citizenship) for the child to be subject to 14th Amendment protection.
  11. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/20/us/politics/elon-musk-hand-gesture-speech.html Helps to link things. Given what he was saying at the same time it appears to be an overzealous “my heart goes out to you” gesture. Poor taste though.
  12. Not the Bills but I’m to the point where someone needs to destroy Mahomes when he runs the ball the way he does. You’ll get a big penalty, ejection, and fine but in the end he’ll think twice. Then show Taylor Swift 😂
  13. Not trying to be a jerk and maybe I’m hitting my breaking point with this team. Who cares what their problems are? -None of us have any say in it. -The organization doesn’t care about embarrassing game attendance. -The owner doesn’t care enough to hire the best possible people for management positions. -They will miss the playoffs again this year and nothing has been done in response to a 13 game losing streak. - Besides Dahlin, a lot of cap was spent on marginal talent that will not be as good as their contractual worth. Bottom line is we already know all the problems and they get rehashed in copy cat threads. At this point they’re something to watch to kill some free time. Hope a number of huge things happen this summer or it’ll be 15 years.
×
×
  • Create New...