JujuFish

Wasn't riding the talent around him? You're kidding, right? Go back and take a look at each of his first three Super Bowls, then get back to me.

Terry Bradshaw has 4 Super Bowls, and I wouldn't put him in the top 10. Super Bowls are not an argument for greatest ever.

the Cheatriots.

The Sabres were #7 in 5-on-5 goals in 05-06, and #1 in 06-07.

$3,525 5 on Buffalo.

I completely agree with this and that would make me overwhelmingly nervous about having Romo as our QB. We allowed more sacks than all but the Browns, Rams, and 49ers.

Haha, that's kind of funny. Here's a better one: Rodgers is now the first player in NFL history to win consecutive playoff games while throwing 350+ yards in each.

I love big underdog bets...5 on Buffalo.

This doesn't answer my question of how. With the injury clause, it would have been blatantly obvious why he was being benched, and since he was being benched so Buffalo wouldn't necessarily be on the hook then it goes to reason that Buffalo has no confidence. Ergo, Tyrod, if he has any shred of logic, would see right through it.

I don't see how.

I also would like every game to be worth the same, and I think a 3-2-1 system is the best way to get that done. No ties, but also no shootout. OT goes on until there is a winner, but it is 3-on-3 and perhaps no offside rule, to help ensure games don't get ridiculously long.

I want to put 4 on Buffalo. Crawford is 7-0 against us, with a .937 save percentage, and Chicago is on a 9 game winning streak against us overall, so this is probably a terrible bet. To clarify, by "want" I mean I'm going to put 4 on Buffalo.

$2,625 + $1,800 puts me at $4,425.

This should be fun. I'll put the rough equivalent on Buffalo, 9 units.

Yeah, Drew Brees, you don't belong under center! And you, Russell Wilson, get out of here! Who do you two think you are, Super Bowl-winning QBs or something?

1) He gave the Bills a huge out with that contract, which they are taking 2) This doesn't mean much at all right now. 3) That drafting comparison is meaningless unless we only look at the rosters of said perennial playoff teams where it involves their picks from the last three drafts (i.e. the drafts Whaley was responsible for). 4) This goes back to the one mistake I mentioned earlier, and it assumes way too much. The fact is that they didn't have the pick to play with, and trying to use the 20/20 hindsight game is a worthless argument. 5) So McKenzie has been GM for an extra year. Let's see how the Bills do next year, then, before trying to say the comparison is cut and dry. 6) Nix is not Whaley. 7) Again, you're playing the 20/20 hindsight game and people were high on Tyrod after last year (tell me how often someone drafts a QB in the first three rounds after their QB goes to the pro bowl).

"How is Whaley part of this organization? <insert one [admittedly big, and I didn't even like it when it happened] mistake>" Outside of the Watkins trade, Whaley has done a good job, IMO.

Thanks! Good job, everyone. Even though we had 3 of the same people in the playoffs as last season, it was a VERY tight race, right down to the end. Next year will be fun.

Anything can happen, but it does look like I'll complete my reverse 64-'66 Bills.

Yes, let's blame the guy with 154 yards receiving and a TD for costing Buffalo the game.

Everyone not named Rex wouldn't have punted there.

Agreed.

Gillislee, I like you.

First lead of the game with 1:20 left on the clock. Should have been sub-1 minute. We'll see if that comes back to bite them.

Hey refs, the Bills don't need your help to lose.