JujuFish

Well, if you're going to discount that particular instance, then you might as well pick .586 as "the number that ACTUALLY matters" since all that still applies. Or even .590 for a rounder number.

Doing more research into this (thanks, procrastination), the 14-15 Bruins, 17-18 Panthers, and 18-19 Canadiens are all tied for second best P% without playoffs, with .585

And for anyone who's curious, our best record without playoffs was the 08-09 season when we went 41-32-9 (DeLuca .500, .555 P%).

The 69-70 Canadiens had a .605 points percentage and failed to make the playoffs. It seems 0.606 P% is the number that actually matters.

Certainly only a moral victory, but I'm sure everyone could do with a morale boost.

Not to jinx it or anything, but we still mathematically have a chance to finish above the bottom 10, something we haven't done since Pegula's first full season as owner.

The hell was that, Krebs

Just tuned in and got treated to a quick pair of back to back goals. Nice!

This got renewed for season 2. Finale is Friday, for anyone interested in bingeing.

I'll be surprised if we let him go. Is there word on how much Chicago offered?

Diggs is only 3 months older than Hill and doesn't depend on his speed.

It's $7.41 million after 3 years. If released before 6/1 of that year, it would be a $7.410 million hit in 2025. If released on or after 6/1, it becomes a $3.705 million hit in 2025 and 2026.

I think this is how it breaks down: He will receive $19.97 million in actual cash for '22, which is $1.12 million base salary + $18.525 million signing bonus + $225k roster bonus + $100k workout bonus. It looks like the signing bonus gets amortized five years, which is where the discrepancy comes into play. So $18.525 million / 5 gets counted against the '22 cap. That makes the cap hit $1.12 million base salary + $3.705 million + $225k roster bonus + $100k workout bonus which equals $5.15 million.

Duke Johnson was mentioned a page back. Greg Mancz is a guy with 9 starts in the last 4 years, clearly a depth signing.

Anyone watching Severance on AppleTV? I'm enjoying it quite a bit.

I hope the Browns go 0-16.

I also think he can still play. I think it's a combo of his salary and declining play. If his cap hit for the upcoming season had been, say, $3 million instead of $7.6 million, I bet he's still on the team.

In his three seasons with us, he's had: 4.9 > 4.3 > 3.7. There's a clear trend there. And his yards before catch also dropped this season: 6.7 > 7.5 > 4.7, and his average depth of target went 8.0 > 7.8 > 5.6. And one of Beane's first comments after the season was that he wanted players who can get yards after the catch, with the images of Hill's huge TD against us presumably on his mind.

Beasley was too expensive and his performance was dropping. His YAC plummeted this year, presumably because he's losing a step.

I'm looking at it and I don't see what you're seeing (or I'm misunderstanding what you're saying). Do you mean there is little to no penalty to end the contract after three years? Because if he's under contract, there is most definitely a cap hit.

That doesn't make any sense to me. Proof? And 33 this month means he'll be almost 39 at the end of the contract.

So we signed Von Miller until he's 38? On the one hand, I love having a beast pass rusher, but on the other, that seems a bit crazy for length.

Totally off topic, but I love Levain Bakery's chocolate chip cookies (NYC chain).

Denver is a good team everywhere except the QB position, so I'm not sure how you can decide they screwed this up. Whether or not it's enough is a different question, but it's a little silly to consider it a bad move.

He is definitely #2.