Your point is a lot different in this point than it was in the last. Saying my post implies there are those on both sides of the fence is fine because it does, saying it implies the quality of those on the wrong side of it is woefully wrong.
As for the bold, well that's all fine, and I'm sure there are those PSU people that are disturbed by that, and they should be, and that is rather the point of my original post that you quoted anyways. To you it seems that this is a rather trivial thing and that they shouldn't be rewarded for such. To be clear I'm not celebrating their stance as it's a pretty easy position to have and one that they should have, I'm simply not lumping them in with the rest of those that don't have it, and claiming Penn State and everyone associated with it are responsible/endorsers/perpetrators of those crimes.