-
Posts
5,213 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
Recent Profile Visitors
5,957 profile views
matter2003's Achievements
First Liner (6/8)
2.4k
Reputation
-
I mean it beats being the worst team in the NHL at home like they were for so long...
-
GDT: Blues @ Sabres, 7:00pm Nov. 6, 2025, π πΊ ESPN+/MSG
matter2003 replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
Ruff pumping them up this morning: "OK boys! We have a chance to set a new NHL record for most OT games in a row! Let's make sure that happens..." -
GDT: Blues @ Sabres, 7:00pm Nov. 6, 2025, π πΊ ESPN+/MSG
matter2003 replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
The determination is he sucks and only plays well when he has to ty and earn something. Outside of that, he looks unfocused, undisciplined and unmotivated day to day. The worst thing for UPL is to have a situation where he is the clear #1 option, you will get the worst version of him instead of the best, which is the absolute worst case scenario for a guy who you expect to be a franchise Goalie. Small sample size so far and if it continues over the course of the year that typically will catch up to you by February. -
Sylvester sure thinks so...
-
Is 5 OT games in a row a new NHL record?
matter2003 replied to PromoTheRobot's topic in The Aud Club
Toronto and Montreal also achieved this in the Stanley Cup Final in 1951 with all 5 games going to OT, with Toronto winning the series and Cup 4-1 -
Is 5 OT games in a row a new NHL record?
matter2003 replied to PromoTheRobot's topic in The Aud Club
No Sabres had 5 in 2022 as well...see above...not sure if there are more than this -
Is 5 OT games in a row a new NHL record?
matter2003 replied to PromoTheRobot's topic in The Aud Club
-
I dunno...Caps literally didn't even have a shot on goal I don't think in their last 3 PP's and the best scoring chance was MacLeod's breakaway shorthanded. If they did have a shot it was nothing dangerous.
-
That would be part of the 8.5% that falls into the "other" bucket π
-
You are actually right...downloaded the data from Moneypuck and there is a very strong correlation between save percentage dropping and high danger chances increasing. | Season | Save % | Goals/Game | Shots/Game | xG/Shot | High-Danger Shots/Game | Avg GSAx (per 60) | | :------- | :----: | :--------: | :--------: | :-----: | :--------------------: | :---------------: | | 2010-11 | 0.913 | 5.48 | 30.8 | 0.088 | 7.9 | +0.12 | | 2011-12 | 0.914 | 5.32 | 30.7 | 0.087 | 7.8 | +0.15 | | 2012-13 | 0.912 | 5.44 | 30.1 | 0.089 | 8.0 | +0.10 | | 2013-14 | 0.914 | 5.46 | 30.6 | 0.089 | 8.1 | +0.13 | | 2014-15 | 0.915 | 5.46 | 30.4 | 0.089 | 8.2 | +0.14 | | 2015-16 | 0.915 | 5.42 | 30.2 | 0.089 | 8.3 | +0.11 | | 2016-17 | 0.913 | 5.53 | 30.3 | 0.090 | 8.5 | +0.09 | | 2017-18 | 0.912 | 5.94 | 31.8 | 0.091 | 8.7 | +0.06 | | 2018-19 | 0.910 | 6.02 | 31.5 | 0.092 | 8.8 | +0.04 | | 2019-20 | 0.910 | 6.04 | 31.3 | 0.092 | 8.9 | +0.03 | | 2020-21 | 0.907 | 6.23 | 30.7 | 0.093 | 9.0 | +0.01 | | 2021-22 | 0.904 | 6.36 | 31.1 | 0.094 | 9.2 | +0.00 | | 2022-23 | 0.904 | 6.60 | 31.9 | 0.095 | 9.4 | β0.02 | | 2023-24 | 0.903 | 6.73 | 31.6 | 0.096 | 9.5 | β0.03 | | 2024-25* | 0.900 | 6.81 | 31.8 | 0.097 | 9.6 | β0.04 | The correlation is -.91486 between Save Percentage and High Danger Shot %, meaning as high danger shots increase, save percentage drops. A perfect correlation is 1.0 or -1.0 in this case, since it's a decrease, so this is extremely strong. Essentially, this shows that 91.5% of the the variance in save percentage is caused by high danger shot quality, leaving only about 8.5% to other things.
-
Nobody is watching anyway, so maybe it doesn't matter? I mean an NFL week 3 pre-season game likely gets higher ratings than the Stanley Cup Finals.
-
There is no way the promise was "You play like dog crap, put up bad numbers for early 1980's goalies, play worse every opportunity you are given and don't worry, you will still have a spot here, accountability be damned!"
-
What's the interest rate they are charging? Did the Amerks fight for a better rate due to the Fed's lowering interest rates again?
-
He is young still...goalies typically take a while to develop, so he should realize that and stop trying to rush the process and just focus on improving and being ready when he gets called up and given a chance. He posted an .872 and 4.12. Sorry, I gave him too much credit in the initial post. It was an .872 not an .878. Those are the results, I don't care about any mental ***** about why or how or whatever else on where they came from. He simply wasn't good enough when he was given the chance. Period. Your job as a pro is to be ready when your number gets called and to do your job, and he failed repeatedly to do that. That being said, he is still very young and most goalies typically aren't ready until 25 or 26, so he very well could be exceptional within the next 2 or 3 years as he is only 23.
-
It DOES matter because Levi has had full control to change that HIMSELF and has repeatedly puked all over himself when given the opportunity. Not only has he sucked but he has gotten WORSE every chance he has been given. An .878 and 4.12 last year? Is that a joke? That wouldn't even cut it in the era of Grant Fuhr when good goalies were routinely at .900 or lower. He wants to be mad? Fine. Be mad at your damn self and hold yourself accountable for sucking Saskatchewan Moose C0ck when given the chance to allow them to do something they have been dying to do from Day 1.
