LGR4GM

You wanna play this game then who would you have picked? Personally the only one that I think is obvious, is I would have skipped Savoie and drafted Mintyukov. But both of your arguments make no sense at all. Who cares about having Tuch, Thompson, and Mittelstadt? It takes 2-3 years at the earliest for even first round picks to make an NHL impact. Your argument has no logic behind it other than "but we had drafted other forwards" which is like... well yea, we also have 2 first overall defenders and a 4th overall defender. Why would we be wasting high picks on more LHD? What would you have drafted there? Not centers? Wingers? I don't even understand your argument because it is so illogical. Maybe 1 of the bolded players will be an NHL regular. Sardarian has 26pts in 20 NCAA games which is his 3rd season. He'll be 22 in 1 month. Marjala has 33pts in 32 games in Liiga, he's another guy about to be 22. Those numbers from both look like 3rd or maybe 4th line guys after you get them a full AHL season. Neuchev is interesting as he looks decent in the AHL but is yet another guy a year or more away from the NHL. Richard maybe is a middle 6 winger in another 2-3 years. Miedema is an overager in the OHL so unless he puts up historic numbers, idc. He has AHL tweener written all over him. He maxes out at a 3rd line 30pt winger probably, that's on the high end. But again, this makes your argument even less logical. We shouldn't draft forwards high because we have too many and it hurts the forwards we drafted lower? What ? You draft talent and then trade for what you don't have. Also, this completely ignores the fact there are 12 forward spots and only 6 defense slots, 3 of which are taken by 1st overall, 1st overall, and 4th overall players. Also also, if these guys you claim might be good, why can't we trade them to an org where they will get "oxygen" if they are valuable? You think NHL gms go "oh man Neuchev looks really good but like he was drafted later than Östlund so we can't trade for him". SO my final question is, are you seriously arguing that Buffalo should have drafted fewer forwards and more defenders high? Granted this ignores the Kleber, Strbak, McCarthy picks or the Novikov and Komarov (if his skating improves) that are in the system. Exactly, which is why you trade Savoie and draft Helenius.

Benson was also still eligible to play at the WJC regardless of being on an NHL team. Also Canada left Misa at home when their rush and goal scoring abilities were bad. Wasn't a smart move.

That's not logical. You can always move centers to wing. Also, savoie isn't a center at the NHL level impo. Rosen isn't a center either. Drafting 4 centers aka 4 forwards is fine.

Hanging on to prospects forever because they might some day be something isn't a good way to build a team either. Also McLeod isn't a 4th liner. He's a middle 6 players but the Sabres would rather play favorites than win hockey games.

But to make the Sabres he has to push out either Benson or Peterka at some point. Do we want 2 sub 5'11" wingers?

Zucchini, especially cooked.

We need to move Samuelsson, Jokiharju, and either Power or Byram.

That guy has 21 give aways and 2 take aways this season. Fits perfectly in Buffalo.

Helenius will be eligible and should be at the 2026WJC too. He's never going to be a flashy guy but he's going to be a good 2way player in the NHL in 4 years.

In the 10 games before your cutoff, Savoie had 4a... total in 10 games. No goals. His current 4 game point streak is double the longest previous he's had (2 games). Is it possible something clicked and Savoie is a juggernaut? Sure, but it's not likely.

Savoie is on pace for 62pts in 72 AHL games. Rosen is on pace for 62pts in 69 AHL games.

They also didn't lose because of him. Buffalo gave McLeod trash wingers and you are in here telling me he's terrible. He's exactly what he was a 3rd line center, he should have Krebs spot but Krebs is one of the favorites. Savoie didn't have a roster spot unless you're getting rid of Benson or Peterka. That was the issue there.

It's from the show Shoresy if you didn't know. 1:43 if the time stamp didn't work.

Ok, I'm ready. Pick Byram or Power, add Cozens to the deal, get petterson and whatever you need to balance this out. I think the deal has to be Byram unless you're taking a cap dump to even out the money. I'm not saying that's my preferred choice. Cozens, Byram, 2025 3rd for Pettersson, and a 2nd

It's funny Isn't it? Eichel leaves and gets better. Reinhart leaves and gets better. Next up is Dahlin.

The defense looks about the and under this coach for the 3rd year in a row, yet Adams does nothing. He's doing too much.

Dahlin overplayed himself on that play. Sadly, this team is total trash and the defensive coach hasn't been fired. The result is Peterka does nothing to help. The big issue is there's 5 players on the ice and they are all individuals, playing different games.

No no, see ppl here like Peterka and dislike Dahlin, so it's Dahlins fault they didn't make Tuch captain. That's the logic.

Get them over the top of a game 7 final they lost 2-1? Come on now this is absurd.

After they contended for a cup with him.

I wonder how Marco Rossi is doing these days...

Because I think I can trade some combination of Cozens and Byram and still use that 1st round pick. So you're only asking half the correct question. Do I want Petterson and Cozens/Byram or do I want Petterson and Misa with no Cozens or Byram.

Lol, are you seriously asking if McLeod is worth re- signing? Your take here is bad impo. McLeod should be the 3rd line center but Adams and company are obsessed with making Kulich that.

I don't agree because you're comparing nonsense to the top 4 in this draft. Further, what you fail to at least acknowledge is that Buffalo could win the lottery. So you're giving away potentially 1st overall. You'd be better served trading Cozens and stuff than that imo.

For all the talk of Buffalo rushing players, Novikov is a good example of patience. Love his potential.