LGR4GM

I question beans drafting a lot these days. He finds nfl players sure, but other than Cook (who they barely used) who else is all pro or even all star? On offense or defense? That said, I don't follow the nfl draft much so I could be wrong.

We're talking any doxxing right? I guess this isn't that, may bad. https://time.com/7323442/south-carolina-judge-diane-goodstein-house-fire-trump-political-violence/ Edit: link broke

Henry Thrun is on waivers, waive Bryson and add Thrun.

How are you missing 2goals? -20 and 245gf for Montreal. Buffalo has 24 more at 269.

The Sabres should immediately make room for him.

I'd guess their forwards and depth defense don't grade out that well.

Unprovoked I think. There's video upthread somewhere.

Zach Benson is certainly known for being soft and ineffective. Ziemer and Helenius too.

What's really interesting is that a bunch of the projections have Sabres making the playoffs.

Greer attacked Hagel in the previous game.

Ok people need to just stop this. Dahlin was a mess at 21 because of Ralph Krueger and nothing else. Owen Power is nowhere close to Dahlin. Owen Power is still below Dahlins rookie year.

Oh yea shows "teams that care". This game got completely out of hand and honestly the refs should have ended it after the first period. This wasn't hockey. This shows they cared. What about is debatable.

The implication being you don't have to answer mine either. Wanted to clarify that I don't expect something different. Sometimes there's just no bridging a gap.

Idk 33 is grown

I'm not required to answer your questions the way you want. 😉

No, I should have added that trade in as well. I was saying Peterka for Doan.

Speaking of score effects:

I'd burn my Sabres jerseys in alumni plaza.

Now, next time I walk away, leave me alone. These threads are useless and if you want to post, that's all you. We disagree Hank, and I'm good with that. No need to just constantly do it. Liger, out.

This post is partial nonsense and partial correct. Some of these were left leading individuals. However a bunch have no known or confirmed political affiliation and some are right. Basically you shouldn't take this list at face value as it's not correct. Further, this post leaves out several well known right wing attacks which seems odd if we want to have a sensible conversation.

I support and uphold the US Constitution and the rights and amendments therein.

Oh yea that Whitehouse supercut isn't misleading at all. And Daugherty provides lots of proof that there's only paid "rioters" at the ice facility. Right, sure sure sure. All hail emperor trump! Praise be our great leader.

Lol. Please, show me in this thread specifically my "far left bluesky nonsense" so I can double check it. Please, I'd love to see it.

Propaganda: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a particular cause, doctrine, or point of view. No, I'm using the word I want. And I'm using it correctly. Figured I chime in one last time.

All of these accounts are right wing, most are either far right or straight up mouthpieces for Trump. We're not having a real conversation, we're being fed propaganda and whenever we suggest something else it's "strawman" Another 2 accounts that are right wing. No actual information, just slanted coverage or outright propaganda.