dudacek

In the 1st 2 rounds, we don’t pass on a more highly ranked player because of position. For example, if our top tier is Wright, Savoie, Kemmel, Nemec and Cooley, and Kemmel is there where we pick at 8, we don’t go for Geekie over Kemmel. All things being equal you take the centre and avoid the LHD, but the need is overstated. The Sabres have 4 1st-round centres from the past 6 drafts - more than pretty much any NHL team. Given the fact we will likely have 4 top 40 picks, I would be surprised if we don’t emerge with 1 or 2 centres this year but you have to take what the draft gives you.

Also, the line that caught my attention was that anyone who exits protocol won’t be returning for at least 3 months because they won’t be tested again in that period.

So this means the Sabres who went into protocol Sunday might be eligible to return as early as Friday and the ones from before Christmas could even be eligible tonight?

Not sure exactly what you’re looking for, but if you want talented, physically immature 1st rounders who smashed concerns about their size, how about MitchMarner, Clayton Keller, Nikolai Ehlers, Teuvo Teravainen, Tyler Ennis, Claude Giroux, Zach Parise, and Danny Briere,

Interesting. Can’t say I watched any of them particularly closely, but I did notice a few in the games I’ve watched. Slafkovsky’s skill was notable against Sweden, but he’s not a pace-pusher. Wright looked like a good hockey player, but not a game changer. Mesar didn’t stand out. Really liked what I saw from Nemec.

I actually thought he might have had an assist on the 2nd goal. He rotated back alertly on D and broke up the rush smartly, leading to the rush that scored. He also didn’t look as tiny as I expected and was not getting overpowered. And, as I said in my original post, he looked engaged and responsible and fast. However, he didn’t actually do anything - lead rushes, force turnovers, create chances, get chances… You’d expect a kid who had been playing against men all year to show more against boys. The most frustrating thing was his lack of ice time. I think he had maybe 8 shifts in the last 2 periods? He is the 3rd-highest drafted forward on that roster (Eklund, Holtz) but he is also one of its youngest players. He may have a coach who looks to his vets first. Hopefully he gets more chances as the tourney progresses. I thought Team Sweden put out a real selfish, entitled vibe against Slovakia. They are going to need to adjust something if they want to progress in this tourney.

What did you think of his play?

Should I be surprised that those lines make perfect sense? All three have been put in a position where they can succeed. Actually really makes this one an interesting watch. Also, the Amerks are in trouble.

Rosen looks fast and invested but accomplished very little in the game I saw. Got some time on the 2nd unit PP but overall not a ton of ice time. Seemed to be an afterthought in his coach’s mind, more of a Hinostroza role. Did not showcase anything that screamed “1st rounder”

Just realizing how inexperienced the staff is beyond Donnie. Christie has never coached above the EcHL. The other three have never been head coaches at any level.

No one does.

Power wins a lot of battles without appearing to use much energy at all. Seals, protects, and moves the puck smoothly.

But when they other guys did it they never played lousy.

Are you taking about the drops in the end zone, or forgetting they happened? I’m sorry man, but the Pats passing game did “fine” today, but there are a handful of games this year when Josh played “lousy”? What am I missing?

See if Josh had a game where he put up something like, say, 14 for 32, 145 yards, 2 picks and no TDs, then I’d understand if somebody said he played a lousy game.

Living in the Vancouver market makes it impossible for me to like the Canucks. I think it might be similar to how many of you feel about the Rangers, who are a shrug to me.

To me, lousy means - at best - below average. Horrible means right at the bottom or close to it. The Bills have been around for what, 60 years? Where do Allen’s numbers rank on the all-time list of Bills QB seasons? How about the numbers of the offence, or the defence? They’ve lost 6 games and 5 of them were by a TD or less. I can’t believe fans of the Bills, of all teams, have forgotten what lousy means.

It was interesting watching the WJC exhibition game today. You guys have slowly won me over on the need to play your natural side. But Canada and Russia didn't have a RHD playing today between them. Maybe it's not as universal as you think.

Don't have much to add, matches my take. Novikov plays hard and has a physical presence.

Friedman tells Peters and Rivet that he's heard the sale rumour but that he would be surprised if anything gets done prior to the stadium deal being done. He thinks selling the Sabres would give fuel to stadium deal opponents.

After the Whistle podcast Peters says he's hearing the Sabre have a 1st on the table for a defenceman. Friedman responded he hasn't heard that, but he wouldn't be surprised. Peters then asked if it was true Chychrun is available. Friedman says he is and his age and contract status fit exactly what the Sabres are trying to do.

I'm not against Peterka going if that's what he wants. But I'm not sure how the WJC would help his development. He has already played at the WJC twice and dominated his 2nd trip. And he is flirting with being a top 10 scorer in the AHL on a team that would suffer without him. I'd rather him continue playing against better competition in Rochester instead of toying with other kids and losing in the process.

Think I recall reading on here that Steve Smith was a "Krueger" hire and Granato was a "Botterill" hire. And that is often the case when it comes to rounding out a coaching staff. Not that the coach and the GM work separately, just that there are various degrees of compromise in where the buck stops.

Not sure which thread we were having the intense debate on the relevance of UPL's numbers in Rochester over the past two years, but Seth Appert had a great response to that in his INstigators podcast. Essentially, he said it was about sample size. He's played 12 games in Rochester this year, 2 or 3 of them early were absolutely stinkers, and to Appert's mind outliers. His play since is more indicative of his typical game. But the outliers are too much to overcome statistically in a 12-game sample. Similarly, he said that last year UPL was very good until he got COVID (which I don't think I knew about) and it took him a while to get back up to full speed after COVID. Again, the COVID recovery period represents an unusually large portion of a 14-game sample size. Over 100 games in a typical 2-year stretch these 2 "blips" wouldn't have had significant impact on his numbers. But he only played 26, so they do.

'Lousy' is a pretty relative term. But many people seem to define it simply as "he lost"