dudacek

"The common denominator or characteristic for all of these guys that I've mentioned — Quinn, Cozens, Krebs, Dahlin I'd throw in that category — is — Thompson and Mittelstadt too — is that they're so ultra-competitive and they love the game of hockey so much that when something bad happens they don't switch to something else and go home and hang their head. They don't let it go until they fix it." — Don Granato on WGR, after responding to a question about Owen Power by saying "his personal standard is as high as it gets."

Donnie said yesterday Kyle and Alex would not play regardless if they were cleared. Still waiting on Krebs?

You haven’t seen much of the players I’m talking about either - certainly not developed and together over an extended period of time.

But the gist of my question is are there enough players coming around Cozens who are like Cozens and approach the game the same way? As far as the bold goes, I think he does, at least in the context of outside the NHL. He's played with or against most of them on the international stage. He's watched most of them perform first-hand and right out of his mouth he's been following their seasons. And they all seem to be dedicated hockey players and winners: captains, top player honours and/or gold and silver medalists on the world stage. Almost to a man.

“Everyone here is very excited for what we’ve got going and the pieces we have, and we know that we’re going to be a real great team in this league one day and we know that we are going to be a team that can compete for a Cup.” - Dylan Cozens, responding to a question about the recent Rochester call-ups. When Cozens says this, he sounds like he believes it. He looks at Krebs and Quinn and Levi and has seen firsthand what they can do against the best players their age in the world. He knows what Johnson and Peterka and Power and Dahlin have done on the WJC stage, and probably Samuelsson and Jokiharju, and UPL and Mittelstadt as well. We saw Krebs responding in a similar way last week, when he spoke about a group coming together for the next decade or more. The Sabres have assembled 10 top prospects (Power, Quinn, Peterka, Cozens, Johnson, Levi, Krebs, Portillo, Dahlin and Samuelsson) all born within a 30-month span. There has to be a certain amount of swagger that comes from seeing that many top athletes gathered on one team at the cusp of adulthood, the type of young alpha confidence that must permeate places like the Alabama football program. We talk a lot about culture change. And I think we recognize that Cozens represents the type of culture we want our team to have. I guess my question is, do the other members of the Blinding Light Brigade feel the same way and are they approaching this opportunity the same way? Have we collected the right pieces at the right time with the right support system for critical mass to be achieved? Can they survive the growing pains and achieve their potential together? Or is Dylan just in the same naive headspace Jack Eichel was five years ago? https://www.nhl.com/sabres/video/dylan-cozens-11022/t-277437090/c-10166546

I think this may have actually happened. Bryson said he was quarantining with him.

@Thorny when was Baker’s ranking from? In general, prior to the Adams era, Ive found him to be rather generous in his appraisal of Sabres prospects, but also pretty much in tune with how the team itself regards its prospects.

Not exclusively about forwards, but I’ve listened to Donnie enough to really start to see a 3-tiered theme in the way he thinks about his players: 1) the blinding light brigade who not only have all the talent in the world, but also have the correct mental approach to developing it. All they need is to continue pushing the envelope and they will get better. He is excited about these guys. His comments on Quinn and Asplund today fit them here. Dahlin and Mittelstadt are the poster kids. 2) the key vets who approach the game and their teammates the right way and he doesn’t have to worry about. The best examples are wearing the “As” or are named Craig Anderson. From what I’ve heard, Hayden and Caggiula might be here as well 3) The guys who don’t fully fit in either category yet and and need to move into one soon or be left behind. Bjork, from yesterday’s comments, has moved into this group. He doesn’t speak badly of them, he just speaks about them in a different way. He has been given chances to elevate Subban, Murray, R2, Hagg, Pysyk, Butcher and Miller, but did not. I have not heard enough to be confident where Olofsson, Skinner, Hinostroza and Eakin are. I will say that when asked about Victor’s struggles recently and Jeff’s early in the year, he talked about what each of them had to do to overcome without the same “and I’m confident he will” that I heard when he had similar questions about Asplund and Dahlin.

That’s been his Team Canada number and R2 hasn’t exactly cemented it.

The big question is will he be wearing 22? With our two best prospects sharing the same number on their respective development teams, I've been curious as to who would grab it in Buffalo first.

And a damn good one. Currently 18 all-time for points by a U22 defenceman, with three months to go. Should end the season in the top 10. Ahead of Leetch, Karlsson and Potvin. https://www.eliteprospects.com/league/nhl/stats/all-time?position=d&age=u22

To the COVID list? Was that why he disappeared mid-game against the Wolfpack?

And Bjork and Fitzgerald come off it.

Also, looks like Murray's demotion was more than a stint aimed at keeping him fresh.

LOL. Figures Bjork and Fitzgerald beat COVID quickly and Okposo Tuch and Krebs did not.

At least the defence looks healthy again

Of course he has

Nice to listen to the local radio guys debate the pros and cons of signing Kane and not have to worry about him coming here.

Does this mean multiple player are not expected to clear their 5-day protocol?

He does. And he scores a lot of points, which matters in arbitration. He’s not going to have much of a hammer there walking in this year with a 10 goal season. But he is comfortably averaging more than 20 goals and 50 points per 82 over his career. His current injury really complicates things, including the chance he can be traded for a haul at the deadline. Victor Olofsson, sniper, at $3 million as an RFA is an easy 1st rounder, IMO. Victor Olofsson playmaker, not so much. Comparables (recent late RFA wingers with similar stats) include Bjorkstrand (5x5.4), Domi (2x5.3), Vrana (3x5.2), Fiala (1x5.1), Garland (5x4.9), Burakovsky (2x4.9), Labanc (4x4.7) Bennett (4x4.4), Beauvillier (3x4.1), Iaffalo (4x4). He’s going to be a tough decision for Adams.

You’re surprised/upset about booing the punter who shanked 3 punts out of about 50 touches? This is the same fan base ready to punt Rasmus Dahlin for shanking three blueline plays out about 500 touches.

You can’t have it both ways and say Josh’s good numbers are irrelevant if he doesn’t make the big plays when it counts to win, and then say the big plays to win don’t count when he doesn’t have the numbers. For the record, I thought Josh did a bad job throwing the ball today, probably his worst performance of the season.

I’m not the best math guy out there, but if that’s the difference between .958 and .948, does that mean the difference between he and Portillo at a very respectable .919 would be like 100 goals a season? .919 is easily a starter’s number in the NHL.

Pretty sure someone could have put together a similar, but even more impressive video on Dahlin using clips strictly from from the Sharks game. I know there are many ways people can take that, but I’m sure it’s true. The way Dahlin was carrying and moving the puck using subtle signals to create space was sublime.

I don’t think it’s 98 per cent, but it’s more than half. Do you feel the same way Rich does?