Jump to content

dudacek

Members
  • Posts

    30,258
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Making adjustments between periods

Recent Profile Visitors

53,588 profile views

dudacek's Achievements

Hall of Famer

Hall of Famer (8/8)

18.2k

Reputation

  1. Lot of overthinking here. McLeod seems like the definition of a good 3C. Pay him like one, use him like one, support him like one.
  2. Yep, don't read that as 4 stars, and don't read it as in addition to what we have now. Don't focus on the exact trades here; I'm not even sure I'd make these moves, it's just a rough illustration Three moves: Peterka and Samuelsson to the Rangers for Will Cuylle and K'Andre Miller. Byram to Calgary for Rasmus Andersson Sign John Tavares 3 years $7.5M Don't get bogged down on the moves themselves. I'm not trying to make you like these particular deals. It's really more about proposals that aren't outlandish: the types of players we might be looking for, approximate values our pieces might return, and changing the identity. The trades are kinda modelled on Cozens for Norris — good players who come with question marks. Let the GMs figure out the sweeteners. If we've got one thing it's the throw-ins pieces to complete a deal. Cap's not a worry. These moves leave you with about $16M to re-sign McLeod, Miller and Cuylle and to add pieces around the edges. To round out the lineup, you could plug Benson in as the final top 6 forward, shop Quinn for another blueliner, and make Kulich wait his turn, or force his way past the rest like Krebs did this year. You've got Norris, Tavares, Cuylle, Andersson and Miller instead of Cozens, Quinn Peterka, Byram and Samuelsson. Can't guarantee this improves the overall talent level of the roster, but it significantly changes the identity. I'm just trying to show Swamp the possibilities, assuming we've got a GM who can identify what might actually be the right moves, then execute them.
  3. Been there. Done all that research, but you're fighting a losing battle. My favourite is "Alex Tuch is a 3rd-liner on a good team." Alex Tuch is the 10th-highest scoring Right Wing in the NHL over the past 3 seasons. Stanley Cup champion Florida's 7, 8, 9 forwards in scoring last year got 35, 27 and 15 points (Lundell, Luostarinen and Cousins) respectively. None of that matters. People think it's still a 21-team league and Stanley Cup winners have 3 20-goal scorers on their 3rd line.
  4. It would seem to be the most Sabreish thing to play hardball with an unheralded player they watch emerging before their eyes while ignoring lack of same with their touted high picks. Yet this is the same leadership that went all in on Tage Thompson, so perhaps that comment isn’t fair at all. I just wish I had more reason to trust their judgement.
  5. The only thing that keeps me resolute in these endless dark times is your unwavering faith and steadfast optimism.
  6. i said it in more detail up-thread: I add 2 top 6 F and 2 top 4 D by moving any required pieces not named Dahlin and Thompson
  7. Passing definitive judgment on a 7-year contract one year into said contract is kinda silly IMO. The entire point from the team’s perspective is you pay more than you have to now in order to get more than you paid for later. And given the status of the Sabres organization in terms attracting and retaining talent, locking up premier homegrown talent you believe in long-term and early seems to be a prudent strategy to me in general terms. I wish it was what we had done with Sam Reinhart. Easy to jump on those particular deals in hindsight. Just like it is easy to say in hindsight the Thompson extension was a great one. Given the pedigree and trajectory of Cozens and Power at the time of those deals, I have no argument with Adams making those bets. We’ll see how they look in 2029. Given the pedigree and trajectory of Samuelsson, that one was poorly conceived from the get-go. There was no need for it. I shrugged at the time because I liked Samuelsson, but it was clearly coming from a place of hubris. Kudos to those who called it out for what it was at the time.
  8. Again, we have about $24M to work with - more than half the league. You’re looking at this through extremely rigid parameters. The solution is obviously trades and we have cap flexibility to make them. We don’t have to keep any of the free agents, we don’t have to keep any of the already signed players. Qualifying offers for the 7 RFAs total something like $10-12M. Only Byram and McLeod have arbitration rights. Yes, we are vulnerable to offer sheets, but only if our GM lets it get to that point. The only way we have “no money to work with” if we sign our RFAs to big long-term deals and roll back the same roster.
  9. If I was named GM, I would be ecstatic to be handed a team with : A an elite NHL goal scorer in his prime, locked up to a bargain contract B an elite NHL defenceman beginning his prime, locked up to a fair contract C a large cache of cheap young talent accumulated over the Adams period D a fair amount of flexibility under the cap I would take a long hard look at the rest of my "core" and flush a large part of it in order to acquire players that help me now. (yes, like Adams did with Cozens) This means shopping: Byram and Peterka as in-demand talents needing new contracts who might be redundant. Samuelsson and Quinn as the most broken/disappointing pieces from the current build Alex Tuch as a soon-to-be UFA aging out of my window UPL as a guy I'm not entirely sold on as my future a top 5 pick in the coming draft Owen Power as my most valuable remaining asset I'm not giving these assets away, and I don't have to trade them all. But i want to see what they can buy me, especially if I can offer some futures or eat some cap to upgrade at their roster slots. And I have to move some of them in order to send a message . The goal should be adding 2 new top 4 defencemen and 2 new top 6 forwards for the new coaching staff to work with. You're not going to get that by clinging to the broken dreams of the current roster. Fix the chemistry. Rasmus and Tage deserve it.
  10. Are most of you resigned to more of the same? Or does Pegula’s presence on the road trip mean something? As in: He is considering replacing Adams and wanted to spend more time around the team to get a sense of where it is? He is considering Adams’ plan for fixing this and wanted to spend more time around the team to get a sense of where it is? The yacht is being painted and Beane and McDermott requested some quiet time before they presented him with their draft board. As I’ve said before, it is hard to remember an NHL team that has charted the same path as the Sabres have over the past two years and didn’t make major changes.
  11. I’d give up Matt Savoie
  12. Athletic look based mostly on 5-on-5 goal differential. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6217351/2025/03/22/nhl-top-defense-pairs-rankings/ It’s a shame that the Sabres are clouded in negative storylines because Rasmus Dahlin’s ascension as a superstar defenseman probably deserves more league-wide recognition. Buffalo’s top pair is crushing opponents, controlling nearly 56 percent of shot attempts and 57 percent of goals. Dahlin is clicking at a near point-per-game rate while also driving high-end defensive numbers, which is impressive considering the club’s overall defensive struggles. Bowen Byram also deserves credit for excelling in a supporting role as Dahlin’s partner for most of the season
  13. If you struggle to attract free agents from elsewhere, signing your own at least protects an asset and covers your ass from the potential for having to replace Greenway, Zucker and Bryson with, say, Craig Smith, Tanner Pearson and Kale Clague? That’s all I got 🤷. Any big changes this summer were and still are always going to be about trades.
  14. Has Topias Leinonen shown the most improvement of any prospect this y3ar? 13/10/1 with a 2.31 average and a .910 save percentage and 4 shutouts (5, 6, and 2 among starters) splitting the starts this year is pretty solid. But he seems to have grabbed the reins entirely down the stretch and into the playoffs. eliteprospects has him with a .929 S% over his past 10 games and .946 over his past 5. To be clear, these are Swedish D2 numbers, but Sweden seems to have been good for him after being absolutely brutal in Finland the 2 years since he was drafted.
  15. Among the 40 defencemen who have played 55 games and average 22 minutes TOI a game, he's second in the league, behind only Aaron Ekblad https://www.nhl.com/stats/skaters?report=penalties&reportType=season&seasonFrom=20242025&seasonTo=20242025&gameType=2&position=D&filter=gamesPlayed,gte,55&filter=timeOnIcePerGame,gte,22&sort=netPenalties&page=0&pageSize=50 But the other thing to consider is how penalties are a two-way street. From the same sample, Dahlin is tied with Makar for 1st in penalties drawn. https://www.nhl.com/stats/skaters?report=penalties&reportType=season&seasonFrom=20242025&seasonTo=20242025&gameType=2&position=D&filter=gamesPlayed,gte,55&filter=timeOnIcePerGame,gte,22&sort=netPenalties&page=0&pageSize=50 Overall, most of these guys are a net negative in penalty differential. Dhalin, at -2 is pretty mid in 20th https://www.nhl.com/stats/skaters?report=penalties&reportType=season&seasonFrom=20242025&seasonTo=20242025&gameType=2&position=D&filter=gamesPlayed,gte,55&filter=timeOnIcePerGame,gte,22&sort=netPenalties&page=0&pageSize=50
×
×
  • Create New...