Hank

You misunderstand, I'm not implying that at all. I'm just curious if that would have any impact on the investigation.

So, there were two guys and two girls in Kane's house, right? Did the alleged victims friend disappear into another room with Kane's friend to have sex? If so, does that in any way impact the alleged rape investigation?

No, it's not just you. But it's not as bad as it seems, it's just a couple posters beating their agenda driven drums. The problem is they have a lot of good points that are worth discussing but they are so over the top with their agenda driven rhetoric that it's hard to take them seriously. At least that's my view.

Like the others I think the suspension was unwarranted. However, none of us are privy to PMs/previous warnings between the two of you. Don't buckle to peer pressure. You made a decision, stand by your decision.

Women enjoy orgasms too.

Is it just me or do former Sabres D-men seem to play better in L.A.?

HA!

That's an hour and 22 minutes long, care to summarize?

Question for NS, or any other Canadians.... Is Canuck considered a derogatory term similar to Redskins in America?

Thank you, great answer.

No. Point taken, I'll drop it.

Perhaps we are being obtuse. His answer does not satisfy me. An "I agree" would satisfy me. It seems like a much simpler answer if he in fact agrees, which I question.

You don't have the time? You spent way more time not answering a simple question than if you answered? Perhaps your non-answer is the answer? You would think so, but apparently not...

I'm shocked Dilfer was a top 10 pick.

I find it very curious that you refuse to give your viewpoint when you seem so very full of viewpoints. Hoss, no opinion from you either? Really??

You still didn't answer my question. Maybe if you were more direct? Let me try again, do you believe that a 48 yo woman should go to jail for having sex with a 15 yo boy? a short yes or no response is perfectly acceptable.

You didn't answer my question.

I personally am not trying to make any point, but I am just as curious of your opinion also. Care to share?

Fair enough. However, I am curious about your opinion and am asking you directly. Will you answer?

Because I'm curious if you believe a 48 yo woman should be sentenced to jail for having sex with a 15 yo boy.

I edited while you answered, see previous post.

Are you implying that physical force is a requirement for rape? Do you believe that woman should go to jail?

48 year old adult and a 15 year old kid, gender shouldn't matter, it's statutory rape. Her gender doesn't make her any less of a predator, she should be in jail. If a 48 yo man didn't overpower a 15 yo girl and she wanted to have sex with him you'd be okay with that? Don't we have pages on here crucifying Kane when we thought his alleged victim may have been 16? Why the double standard for the woman? She's attractive so it's okay? But if she was ugly and weighed 260 it would be different?

Yes, there is a double standard. No, it should not exist. She should be in jail. There should be the same outcry as if is was a forty-eight year old man raping a fifteen year old girl.

Why do you believe women don't feel they have the power to say, "don't take my pants off me, I don't want to have sex with you"?