Hank
-
Posts
2,948 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Hank
-
Did you really think the Sabres would win in StL? If not, the the unit cost is not relevant, you're not betting against a spread. Assuming the wings win tonight I'm up almost nine hundred. Even if you bet max units with me my lead will grow because I will have more units available. I figure I'll have 2-3 more units for the Boston game depending on the number. That will put me 1100-1200 ahead of you. I think the rangers line will be closer to the red wings line, the lower the line the more units I'll have available than you. You're right, I'll most likely have to bet the Isles game. But I won't have to bet much, and I won't have to win, I just have to bet the same team you do. You have to bet max units and hope I bet the other team.
-
We'll agree to disagree on on taro and cereal. As far as me taking the lead that is completely your fault for passing on the wings and blues at home. My strategy from here on out, subject to change if my right pinky toe itches, is max units against the Sabres up until the pick-em against the Isles. I'm hoping my lead will be big enough I won't have to bet that one.
-
How is that a smart move for you? Why would you not hold and pray for a Sabres win? That's really the only chance you have.
-
Oops, I missed Claude's 11 units before. So if the wings lose it might go to TM8? That's like Connolly coming out of retirement and winning the scoring title.
-
12 units each. Damn you two for forcing me to go big. I was hoping to sit this one out with it being in buffalo. Taro and cereal are now forced to bet 11 units or fall out of the competition. If Claude stand pat, and the Sabres win, Claude pretty much wins by default. I hate you both for Making me do this, 15 units (3K) on the wings.
-
This is the last open wager before closed bidding, correct?
-
I'm thinking the Sabres might pull one out in philly. A bet of 31 units should wrap it up for me if they come through. What to do.....
-
@ 3120, and perhaps the lead. Can we get an updated standings please?
-
@2320. I'll bet max # of units on the Red Wings tomorrow.
-
Please, take the flyer.
-
Four units on the blues.
-
My understanding is you can only go "all in" if you don't have enough to cover a single unit. This does not apply to you so you can only bet two units as you do not have enough to bet three units. You can not go all in. Am I mistaken? If so I would like to amend my bet to all in(1420) on the Habs. If I am not mistaken then I'll stick with my bet of five units.
-
At 1420. 5 units on the Habs to jump ahead of cereal. Dwight, At what point to we go to blind bids? Maybe you could post who wagered what after opening face off?
-
I think I'm at 1420 with the win. Please correct me if I am wrong.
-
Four units on the nucks.
-
I live 45 minutes from Bridgestone arena and have been to many games over the past decade, and see the Sabres a couple times a year when I visit home. Bridgestone is a much better atmosphere than buffalo.
-
@720, three units on the avs
-
At 420. All three units on the caps.
-
@310 one unit on the Pens.
-
@210, one unit on the jets.
-
All in on buffalo
-
I'm not touching this game, but I'm all in on jersey tomorrow night.
-
330 on the sharks
-
I thought they would have gotten more. -
240 on Chicago 300 balance