5th line wingnutt

1st bold: why? 2nd & 3rd bold: The capitalist offers a job to the laborer, under certain terms and conditions, such as wage rate, and the laborer accepts. The laborer labors and the capitalist pays him, as agreed. This is a completely voluntary exchange. If the laborer was not getting a "fair share" why did he agree to the exchange? Where, exactly, is the taking. Your post seems to be a backwards way of expressing the Marx (not Groucho) labor theory of value.

Sure it is. Halliburton is getting paid for providing goods or services. The welfare client is getting money for nothing (except possibly his vote). In the latter case money goes from the taxpayer to the government to the client with nothing in return. How is this not wealth redistribution.

Leftists believe in the redistribution of wealth. Now you are going to get more of it. Oh, well.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/byron-york-why-trump-doesnt-admit-russian-election-interference thought this would interest you.

I grew up in Jersey and my parents lived there until my Dad died. Their property taxes were outrageous, too.

I left NY partly because the economy was bad and the taxes were too. I left in 1994, have there been tax increases since then? I really did not know it was that bad. Y'all need to march on Albany with torches and pitchforks.

It only hurts if you are paying more than 10K in state and local tax. How many middle class folks is this?

How does this hurt the middle class?

Why do you think this?

It is only the evil, greedy 1 per centers that will suffer. Screw 'em.

Schadenfreudelicious Of interest to New Yorkers.

I agree, and it goes double for public sector unions.

The president has the authority to fire the fbi director for any reason or no reason at all. How does exercising lawful authority constitute obstruction?

He said obstruction was "obvious". That seems pretty slam dunky to me.

Maybe i did. If you have a slam dunk case, why not just state it? Three evasive responses in a row leaves me in doubt as to the strength of your case. What is "YA"?

I have followed this subject. I have not come across evidence of obstruction. Maybe i missed something. Please explain.

What did Trump do that constitutes obstruction of justice?

Not obvious to me. Please explain.

https://www.wired.com/story/a-landmark-legal-shift-opens-pandoras-box-for-diy-guns/

Where did you get this data?

What is the over/under before kavanaugh is hitler?

Barrett is bit too young and inexperienced but i otherwise like her.

!st bold: Why is this bad? 2nd bold: Absolutely poorer or relatively poorer? 3rd bold: We just got done lowering these rates and the economy took off after almost a decade of slow growth. I think the rates ought to be lowered even more. 4th bold: cut spending. 5th bold: I do not think much of boomers either and I am one.

I do not see where either of these disavow personal morality. Why do you think this?

Sometimes it is hard to tell satire from reality. https://babylonbee.com/news/senate-democrats-demand-supreme-court-nominee-not-be-unduly-influenced-by-u-s-constitution/