-
Posts
11,514 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by JJFIVEOH
-
No it's not. It hasn't been a game since a minute in. The Sabres haven't scored more than 3 goals in a month. Caps have 4. You do the math.
-
He hit the nail on the head. This team is a joke.
-
IF BFLO IS GIVING UP ON THIS SEASON WHY THE HELL IS MILLER IN NET!?!?!?!?!?!?!
-
Most of the teams in the conference picked up the one or two games they had in hand over us during that time. Now it's more comparable.
-
Just when you think it can't get any worse. Although they do only have two regulation losses in the last nine games.
-
START ENROTH!!! :D
-
Literally, it was amazing. ???
-
He hasn't been asked to waive his no trade clause. Maybe he's frustrated he might stay here.
-
Panthers with 3 goals in the 3rd in 1:43, started by Brennan, to tie the game 3-3. Brennan leads all Panthers in SOG.
-
Brad Boyes just scored #8 to equal last years total.
-
It's very possible. The Caps are slumping and we all know the best cure for a slump is to play this team.
-
Nice to see Miller offset some incredible saves with a couple of softies. He needs to stop some of those.
-
Unless Enroth was in net, then he'd suck and needed to be waived in order to get a quality backup.
-
###### the refs! That's a horsehit ###### call. Rolston needs to grow some balls and speak up to these ######.
-
START ENROTH! :flirt:
-
While it is a good point, I don't think the number players who have played every game is a good indicator of injuries and thier impact on a team's record. A lot of guys can miss one game. Not to mention in BFLO's case Kaleta getting suspended and Grig, Foligno and Myers getting benched. There's four regulars (at least three) who missed at least one game without being injured. Total man-games lost is more appropriate.
-
If there is a deal nearing completion involving Miller, we'll know on Saturday. No way he starts if something is close. Not going to risk an injury.
-
I'm sorry, I'm here to be entertained. I'm not here to watch my team purposely lose to get a better pick that might turn out to be a bust anyways. With proper management, teams shouldn't need to get a top 3 pick to be competitive.
-
So is Pittsburgh.
-
Actually, I brought up two exceptions on a whim. I'm sure I could find more if I looked. Perhaps since the exceptions occur so often, maybe they're not exceptions after all.
-
Of course exceptions exist, but if you look at the big picture getting a top 3 pick does not guaranty anything. Wouldn't it really suck if BFLO purposely lost games over the next two years and ended up drafting two busts and we'd all sit back and say 'Why did we have to suffer through two years of hell to get picks that didn't pan out?'
-
Like Edmonton? When was the last time the Wings had a top 3 pick? Hell, they haven't had a pick higher than 19th in the last 22 years.