nfreeman

Interesting. I sure don't want a long term deal for him. He did give both Zemgus and Larsson one-year "prove it" deals.

Ever had one in Philly? With provolone instead of wiz? Freaking fantastic.

I will be very surprised if Lehner isn't the starter next season.

You and every male here need to eat your tomatoes in order to be happy later in life. (Google it -- it's medical truth, not an urban myth.)

Thanks. It would appear that scoring helps winning!

Lettuce, tomato and mayo are quite good on: Turkey Roast beef Ham Tuna (white tuna, not Italian/dark) But NFW do they belong on smoked/cured meats, i.e. Salami Corned beef Pastrami Italian hero Pulled pork Those should get brown mustard (1st 3), oil and vinegar (#4) and BBQ sauce (#5). Special category: I like a bit of mayo on a Philly cheese steak, but not lettuce or tomato. JMO, of course, but also 100% the truth.

17 pages on the GDT -- and against a WC opponent! Nice work ladies and gents.

Just for yuks: November: Sabres -- 30th in NHL in scoring (GF/G); 17th in defense (GA/G) December: tied for 24th in scoring; tied for 9th in GA/G January: 7th in scoring; 20th in GA/G

Not sure where $4MM is coming from. It would've cost the Bills $2.5MM to keep him -- either by matching or by tendering that much, which would've triggered RFA compensation. Yes, it was his biggest game of the year, but he was a valuable player for the Pats -- 38 catches @ 18 yards per catch. The Bills could've definitely used a guy like that, especially with the (forseeable!) injuries they sustained at WR.

I'm on board with everything here except the lettuce, tomato, mayo and microwave, each of which is an abomination in this context. Also, the salami should be genoa.

Welcome Coach55!

That would be great, but I don't see them (or anyone else) taking his contract. (Just checked -- it's not as bad as I thought -- 2 more years after this one at $4.6MM per year. Moulson's is 2 more years after this one at $5MM per year. I still don't see anyone taking either of those contracts though.)

I hate to say it, but I don't think we're going to see anything useful out of Ennis this season. His speed is down 25% or so from peak Ennis and without it he's JAG. Last night vs Nashville he was completely ineffective and was replaced with Kane on ROR's line in the 3rd period. Frankly I'm concerned that his days of being a dynamic NHL forward are over -- and that his contract will be an even worse albatross than Moulson's.

Salami with lettuce and mayo? Code red.

Good post. I agree in particular with the bolded. Rebound control has been his Achilles heel, IMHO. There was one bullet from PK in particular that Lehner was able to smother instead of kicking it out into the doorstep, which he's done too often in the past. I thought Lehner was playing very well last night until that first softie when he came off the post to his left. The 2nd one was infuriating. Let's see how he responds.

$6MM per year might be a bit high, but I think he'll get more than he currently makes ($5.25MM). I'd be very happy if this summer we see (i) him work out, get married and stay out of trouble all summer and (ii) the Sabres sign him to a $5.75MM x 5 years extension.

Oh,yeah. http://www.nhl.com/sabres/video/eichel-dekes-buries-game-winner/t-277443696/c-48732503

Eggs-actly. I think the sky's the limit with Jack, but I think Reino-Kane-Gionta will bring out the best in both Reino and Kane and will be pretty formidable. And I've been convinced by dudacek (whom I hope returns soon!) that Reino at C is better for both Reino and the Sabres than Reino on Jack's wing. What the Sabres really need IMHO is for Moulson to come back from the dead or for Fasching, Baptiste or Bailey (or someone else) to step up and be able to hold his own on Jack's wing. I'm fine with Foligno playing on Jack's other wing. As for our blue line -- before we throw in the towel on the current top 4 (Risto, McCabe, Kuli and Bogo), I'd like to see them healthy for 20 games or so. I think that foursome can be a solid group, and I hate the idea of trading Kane to strengthen it -- especially since we all know that the Sabres aren't going to get a true stud on D for Kane.

Unless he's a ... washout? It's always possible. My point is that the Sabres shouldn't (and probably aren't) making plans for Kane based on the assumption that Nylander will fill the void.

I'd like to see: Ennis-ROR-Okposo Foligno-Eichel-Moulson Kane-Reino-Gionta Carrier-Zemgus-COR

OK -- I thought it would make sense to consolidate the various posts on this topic into one thread. I've said a number of times that the "NHL .500" concept is silly, as it characterizes teams who have lost many more games than they've won, and are well out of the playoff race, as ".500" teams. As for the playoff race -- here's how I look at it: the concept that the Sabres are "5 points out of the wild card spot with 2 games in hand" is about as meaningless as the "NHL .500." This is because there are a bunch of teams striving for that last playoff spot, and a number of them aren't going to stand still while the Sabres reel off a winning streak (hah!) and catch them. I think the right way to think about it is that the Sabres are chasing a playoff spot, not a particular team, and the spot is like a car ahead of the Sabres' car on the highway. The spot is advancing down the highway at a rate of about 1.5 points per game. So, if the Sabres win 2 in a row, they've "advanced" 4 points while the spot has advanced 3 points -- so the Sabres have gotten 1 point closer to a playoff spot. That means, of course, that if the Sabres are currently 5 points out of the playoffs, they'd need to rip off 10 wins in a row to get into playoff position. It's rough justice, I know (and the playoff car is probably advancing at a rate closer to 1.3 points per game, not 1.5), but I am pretty confident that if the Sabres were to win, say, 5 out of 6, they'd still be 2-3 points out of the playoffs. Let's see how it goes.

When you lose more games than you win, and you end up with 82 points, you miss the playoffs by a mile. So we can pretend the Sabres are at ".500 points percentage" -- or we can want them to win at least as many games as they lose and at least come close to making the playoffs.

It's gotta be Lenny in net after Sat night.

Your points about the D are reasonable, but Kane is not a 3rd line LW. He's 4th on the team among forwards in ice time. He's also 2nd in goals -- just 2 fewer than KO but in 10 fewer games. Kane is also playing exactly the kind of game that GMTM wanted when he traded for him. Unless something is going on behind the scenes with Kane (which, as I've mentioned previously, I think is possible), I don't think he's going to be traded.

But Goodwin was #3 on the depth chart when everyone was healthy, which was never. My point is that the Hogan is better than the #4-#7 guys the Bills were forced to rotate through. And Hogan is cheap. There was no reason to dump him. (I also think Hogan is better than Goodwin, but that's another story.) It's not that Hogan is a difference-maker or that the Bills would've made the playoffs if they'd kept him. Obviously that's not the case. The point is that DW is a bozo GM, and the Hogan decision is just another piece of evidence.