Jump to content

nfreeman

SS Mod Team
  • Posts

    22,078
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nfreeman

  1. Wowie Housley! I find it a bit interesting that TP went for the up-and-coming-assistant type for both GM slots and both coach slots this summer, after the two established-successful-albeit-with-questions coaches he hired both bombed. I will join the group predicting a Bogo renaissance. Go Sabres.
  2. If Craig Button isn't a complete bozo, he's in the ballpark.
  3. Taro -- if Vegas takes Moulson or Ennis in exchange for a #3 or better, I'm claiming victory in the disagreement. Obviously, if there is no sweetener, you win. I will also stipulate that you win if it's a #5 or #6. Who wins if it's a #4?
  4. Well, I was joking about the women-only screenings (which did occur where I live, btw) -- certainly not as a "shot at women" or as a political comment.
  5. I would trade Reino and #8 for Kane in a heartbeat. And I would add Evander if Chicago wanted to add Seabrook. (And that might be what gets it done for Chicago -- Seabrook is 32 and under contract for SEVEN more years at a $6.875MM cap hit per year.) Boom!
  6. I think that Vegas will probably look to end up with an expensive #1 and a cheap #2. Out of the cheap #2 guys, as you point out, some will currently be on teams from which Vegas will prefer a different player -- reducing the # of alternatives to Linus. I also think the $750K isn't that big a deal in terms of locker room discord in the AHL. If he's in the AHL, Ullmark will probably be one of the best players on the team. Also, with the MODO seal of approval he's probably a pretty likable guy. I just don't see them taking on a lousy player on an albatross contract unless they are paid to do so -- so if their choices are Moulson or Ennis with no bribe, or Ullmark, who is young, credentialed, cheap and has upside -- I think they're taking Ullmark.
  7. You're right. I guess I'm assuming that it's not a #1 or a #2, and I'm happy paying anything less than that.
  8. My wife and I saw "Wonder Woman" over the weekend. (We found a screening that men were permitted to attend.) The last 20 min or so were pretty corny/formulaic, but overall it was pretty good.
  9. That would be great and a very nice opening move by JBott.
  10. I'd agree with this if the $$ were substantial, but it's $750K per season.
  11. This is certainly reasonable and probably right. However, I don't think it supports Taro's point, which was that a 1-way deal would make it unlikely that Vegas would take him.
  12. Why not? He can still be sent down -- Vegas would just need to pay him the $750K. That doesn't seem like a big deal. Vegas definitely takes him before they take one of the Sabres' bad contracts, IMHO.
  13. And maybe Lehner is the price the Sabres pay to unload Moulson? That would create about $8MM-$9MM in cap space for next year (although they'd need to spend some on a goalie).
  14. Interesting. Let's say Lehner's agent told JBott that Lehner wants $5MM x 5 years, and JBott thinks he can probably get a deal done for $4.5MM x 4 years, but not much less. Would JBott rather pay that price for Lehner, or expose him in the expansion draft?
  15. I loved Lindy, but I'm calling NFW on him returning at this point (as a prediction, not a preference).
  16. Very happy to see this, Swamp. And for the other similarly situated fathers: good man.
  17. Great post Flagg. Thanks.
  18. OK, so it's Monday night. What's the ETA for the announcement of a hiring? Friday?
  19. Well, boys, you're not exactly overwhelming us with detailed arguments in support of your positions here.
  20. Pinning this bad boy until we have a HC.
  21. Here's a thread for non-Sabres expansion draft action. Fire at will.
  22. I agree that this season of Fargo hasn't been quite as good as the first 2 seasons, and that GoT also wasn't quite as good as prior seasons. But both are still very good to excellent -- and if I have BCS and either of those 2 in the DVR, I'm watching Fargo or GoT. Of course, YMMV. Wasn't there a hockey game on TV in the bar in one of the last episodes of BB that nailed down the date?
  23. I don't have strong feelings about the "morality" of either side of this issue. There are reasonable points to be made on both sides. I do find it interesting though that the PA apparently cares enough about it to have negotiated for it. It seems like a pretty rare occurrence and it benefits only those who are not yet PA members.
×
×
  • Create New...