Jump to content

nfreeman

SS Mod Team
  • Posts

    22,078
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nfreeman

  1. Right now they are good enough that I am looking forward to the next game, which is substantially better than I expected.
  2. Well, we're only a few games into the season. My thinking was that there would be real pressure after, say, 15-20 games.
  3. Also: I've been plenty critical of Mike Harrington, but that was a pretty good article. I found this in particular kinda interesting: So maybe there is something to the "lousy leaders" theory about those 2.
  4. So far this is looking pretty GD prescient. Well done.
  5. But again: why is now the time to reduce his price? Sure, many fans and sports media types are sick of the whole thing and want to move on, but that's not a good reason from KA's perspective. From his perspective, if he waits, say, 6 weeks, the offers he's getting won't get any worse, but there is a decent chance that his situation will improve, because either (i) teams like the Habs, the Rangers and Vegas will have crappy starts and feel the pressure to make a move, thus increasing their offers to KA or (ii) Eichel will get antsy and have fusion surgery. I just don't see any reason for him to do anything now. He clearly isn't feeling any pressure from TP to bring in players in trade to help the team this year. And right now the team looks much improved (although the air will probably leak out of the balloon at some point). This seems like more agent BS that's been fed to Friedman. They've had months to "collect evidence." They haven't launched the medical grievance procedure because they know they will lose. I don't blame Brisson for fabricating stuff in an attempt to pressure KA to lower his price -- that is what Brisson is supposed to do -- but it seems pretty clear that KA, rightly, sees through it and isn't going to be swayed by it. This could very well prove out, but there is no reason in the world for KA to make a move now. Time is on his side for at least the next couple of months.
  6. Better than Pysyk (i.e. JAG/regular healthy scratch candidate) though?
  7. The tone of the OP -- "See, Reinhart stinks, the Sabres were smart to trade him" -- is the classic bitter-fan-of-a-losing-team crapola.
  8. There are quite a few straws on Evander’s camel’s back at this point. The fake vax card is only the most recent allegation that we’ve heard about.
  9. I don't either. I think it's simply that no one is willing to both take the risk on the $50MM (minus whatever modest retention is agreed) AND pony up a rich trade package.
  10. But there is no reason for the Sabres to do this. Right now, they are looking at a $12.5MM loss (assuming 75% insurance coverage on Eichel's $50MM deal). It only makes sense for them to change the status if either their financial exposure is reduced or if they get a compelling trade package, or some combination of those 2 items. They aren't going to do anything that worsens their position. From their perspective, they can sit back and let the inaction drive Jack crazy and let the pressure build on GMs of losing teams.
  11. That doesn't strike me as realistic either. I don't think the 30 other owners would view it as in their interests to help the Sabres or Eichel, or at least not $50MM in their interests (or $20MM or whatever their piece would be), and I doubt the players would want much if any of the financial obligation either.
  12. Respectfully, I don't think this is realistic. If he goes on LTIR, someone is paying him a non-insured $50MM. If the plan is for the Sabres to be protected, that means that it's a different team that is paying the $50MM -- and has agreed to do so AFTER the ADR has failed and left Jack unable to play. The only reason a team would do so, as you point out, would be for the cap space. If a wealthy team would be willing to pay $10MM in cash per year x 5 years for nothing except cap space -- and I think there are maybe 2 or 3 teams in the NHL who would do this, and TB isn't one of them -- in order to create this cap space, they'd need to send $10MM per year in contracts back to the Sabres in exchange for Jack's $10MM in LTIR space. So who would the Sabres get? At that point, the Sabres would have zero leverage, since they'd be left with a broken Eichel. They wouldn't get the other team's best prospects and rising star RFAs -- they'd get the other team's Okposo or Skinner. Bottom line IMHO is that there is no way for the Sabres not to end up bearing the risk if they allow Jack to have the ADR while he is under contract with them. For that matter, even if his contract is voided, the Sabres are still worse off than they are now in all scenarios other than a full recovery that is somehow demonstrably sustainable.
  13. With the Sabres bearing the risk?
  14. TIL that if you want to bring your dog to France…your dog needs a passport!
  15. The guys that left or are leaving never smiled like that. Not in many moons, anyway. And that was a vintage Skinner goal for the GWG. Wouldn’t that be something if Donnie got him back in the saddle.
  16. Usually when Buffalo sports are flying high, the bubble gets burst thoroughly and cruelly. Last night felt like the first shoe to drop. Maybe it'll be different this time.
  17. TN’s D was substantially better than the Bills’ D, especially on the pass rush.
  18. Allen made a lot of good plays and a lot of mistakes as well. I did not like the offensive play-calling for the most part. And the D got worked. No pass rush in the 2nd half.
  19. Stupid.
  20. They can't really be going for it here.
  21. TN has scored on 6 possessions in a row.
  22. Diggs is freaking great.
  23. Wow. Are you on drugs? WTF are you talking about?
  24. They should've challenged the Beasley play at the goal line and they should NOT have JA sneaking there.
×
×
  • Create New...