Kristian

Don't you EVER post something like that again, without including the name of the organisation in the title!!! :censored: :flirt:

Who is this "Darcy" you speak of....?

Horrible news.

Vanek doesn't cry, he makes the face instead.

Never the same after his knee injury.... NEXT....!

Uuhm.... Didn't know that could happen until today, actually.... Beein saying exactly that for a while now, though LaFontaine was still in office when I first had that thought. Clearly, sending Regier packing has had a positive effect, on the Sabres reputation around the league.

Like I said in another thread, I really like Matt Moulson - Traded to a crappy team, if ever there was one, no nosense, all business, no complaining. Just went out there and was our best player easily, and added offense. Now, I realise Moulson isn't going to set the scoreboard alight like cracy, but I'll say this - Any decent contender in recent years, has a Matt Moulson on the roster somewhere.

Plus, I liked his attitude A LOT - Got dealt to a ###### team (granted, from an already ###### team), and just went about his business, adding offense as best he could. Class.

Fair enough, but that still means he wasn't an asset. At least to us anyway.

The way I understand that, is that part of those offers meant he would've had to take bad contracts in return, and for whatever reason, decided the particular players involved in said deals weren't someone he wanted here. If a player requires bad contracts coming the other way in order to move him, then - by my understanding of it - he's not an "asset". He's just a bad contract being unloaded for another bad contract. Others may disagree, but that's how I perceive an asset.

First of all, it should be clear to anyone now - This team HAD no assets left. Pure and simple. Anyone remotely worth anything went at the deadline. If there were any takers for Ehrhoff whatsoever, don't you think he would've been gone then? Getting an expensive d-man, who doesn't want to be part of a rebuild, and comes with an imminent threat of a cap penalty, both off the books and off the roster is not mismanaging an "asset", it's handling a cluster###### you didn't create, but have been given the task to clean up after.

In other words, anti-Darcy has arrived, and I am more than ready for a few years of no BS, no slacking off, and NO free ###### rides....!

I heard they partied like nuts after both cup wins. Just a rumour though....

Translation : "You have the gall to bitch about the team sucking, while not doing a damn thing to change that yourself, while making millions of dollars - Get the ###### out of my sight!"

Bad link? Top one.

Wouldn't that be "Murray might have to call some team and ask for a bad contract because of this"?

No. 14? A retired no.? What did I miss?

This. Nobody should be judged on the past season alone. Except Leino, but only cause the past season was exactly what we expected from him.

Cap hit or not, keeping Leino around just sends the wrong message to the youngsters, which is the last thing we want to do now.

That's a a stretch - I clearly see him as "alright".

Over.

Are we bringing Regier back too, cause he was the mastermind of this concept.

Why is he still here??!?!??!?!?! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!

Derserved win for the Kings, but despite what I might've thought of the Rags before this series - They sure as ###### made a series of it! 3 OT losses doesn't really say "4-1 series win". This thing should've gone to 6, and could easily have gone to 7.

I ask Darcy Regier, cause clearly - This guy *knows* hockey.....!! :w00t: