There’s a couple of NHL penalties that really bug me as seeming to be too harsh
1. Accidentally shooting the puck over the glass- why does that deserve a 2 minute penalty? If a player was pissed about something and purposely fired the puck into the stands, then it makes sense. Why is this so different from balls out of play in other sports? These pucks aren’t made of gold that make them priceless. Like at baseball games, they become souvenirs for fans. The arena doesn’t send people into the stands to retrieve them.
Why is this delay of game? Is it so hard to skate over to a bench for another puck?
When a player throws the ball out of bounds in a basketball game, it’s just a change of possession. It’s not a technical foul that the opponent gets to shoot a free throw for.
In NFL games, the only time there’s a penalty for the ball going out of bounds is on a kickoff, and I won’t discuss that any further here.
A ball going out of play in a baseball game is just called a strike, not an out.
Why does the NHL believe an accidental shooting of the puck out of play deserves a 2 minute penalty?
2. The other harsh penalty is again a 2 minute delay of game penalty for asking for a replay review and the call isn’t overturned. To me, that’s just crazy. For the NFL and NBA, they just gave teams more timeouts and if the call isn’t reversed, they lose a timeout. I know that NHL teams don’t even use their timeouts in some games, so it wouldn’t be the same, but should this really be handled like an infraction that deserves a 2 minute penalty? I don’t think so.
In Saturday’s Sabres’ game, the refs called for review about a half dozen times. That was a delay of game, but there’s no way to penalize them.
I don’t know what could be an alternative punishment if the NHL believes they have to levy one on a team for these “infractions” but maybe they could break from tradition and create like 60 second or 30 second penalties. Personally, though, I don’t see why either of these incidents need any punishment.