PromoTheRobot

Look, I didn't say it was going to happen. I just spelled out what has to happen. Just for comparison, the Sabres went 16-11-3 in their last 30 games two years ago when they got to 91 points. That's .583. This year that only gets them to 82 points .

They are 11 back with 30 games to go. They need to play at .700 the rest of the way to get into the mix. By blowing another game?

He admitted to not going for retaliation because it was a one goal game. Because he didn't want to blow another game. But you feel free to make up your own stories.

By taking bad penalties and letting you're opponent back in the game? Cracker Jack strategy fer sher. And I'm sure we'd all be so happy losing the game as long as there was a fight right there. Yeah. 🙄 And what did that get them? An L.

I find it hilarious that we are accusing Lindy of getting soft.

You gotta win to be good.

Retaliation, apparently, went into the shitter with the short-handed goal.

There's a time and place for such things. Lindy put more value on not blowing the game by taking penalties.

Lindy obviously felt the way I did, and got a win. Three in a row. Whoop-de-doo, right?

What's the matter? Sad that Lindy put winning the game over some blood lust? 😂 Spin, spin, spin! Gotta save the narrative.

Looks like Lindy and I are on the same page.

Right, and NJ had the momentum. And don't tell you you weren't expecting a collapse at that point. Especially after giving up the shorty and not scoring in a 5-minute power play.

You have to learn to win games, not take stupid penalties in a one goal game. You dish it out when the game is more secure. Otherwise, no stupid penalties.

I was catching up and fast forwarded intermissions.

I see everyone is going off about the lack of retaliation for Tage. You have to be a special type of person to give this officiating crew an excuse to give you a penalty in a one goal game. Retaliation comes late when you are up two.

Good win, especially with how the refs had it in for them.

That never showed up on TV.

So now you can overturn a call by ASSUMING the puck crossed the line. When did that rule change happen?

Rosen with another. This time in alone for the OT winner. 4-3 Amerks over Crunch. Rochester is 4th overall in wins and 3rd in winning percentage in the AHL.

😂 I distinctly recall one failure was not signing Stamkos. But what if he doesn't?

Doesn't Nashville have all the awesome free agents that you need to be a winner?

Well Kulich didn't just wander into the building on his own. Someone scouted and drafted him.

They tried to lose, but they looked like they really cranked up the effort late in the third. Didn't give Nashville room to operate like they did earlier.