-
Posts
15,308 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ...
-
GDT: Anaheim Ducks @ Buffalo Sabres 2/25/25 7 PM MSG
... replied to bob_sauve28's topic in The Aud Club
I like the constant-penalties strategy: Itβs like misdirection. -
GDT: Anaheim Ducks @ Buffalo Sabres 2/25/25 7 PM MSG
... replied to bob_sauve28's topic in The Aud Club
-
GDT: Anaheim Ducks @ Buffalo Sabres 2/25/25 7 PM MSG
... replied to bob_sauve28's topic in The Aud Club
Good pressure! -
GDT: Anaheim Ducks @ Buffalo Sabres 2/25/25 7 PM MSG
... replied to bob_sauve28's topic in The Aud Club
Oh, see, I like the colours, too. They compliment the Sabres' blue nicely. -
GDT: Anaheim Ducks @ Buffalo Sabres 2/25/25 7 PM MSG
... replied to bob_sauve28's topic in The Aud Club
-
GDT: Anaheim Ducks @ Buffalo Sabres 2/25/25 7 PM MSG
... replied to bob_sauve28's topic in The Aud Club
I kind of like the Ducks' unis. -
GDT: Rangers @ Sabres, Feb 22, 2025 - 5:30PM, MSG πΊ, WGR550 π» π
... replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
The oniy thing I noticed was the Ranger's stick hit Tuch in the diaphragm area. -
GDT: Rangers @ Sabres, Feb 22, 2025 - 5:30PM, MSG πΊ, WGR550 π» π
... replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
Hmm. Can't determine what was hurt there. -
GDT: Sabres @ Predators Feb 8, 2025 - 8:00PM, MSG πΊ, WGR550 π» π
... replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
So, I sit down to see what a winning Sabres team looks like and I get this s#@t. -
These are not causal events and aren't worth connecting: Tommy Dangles being hit and possibly out of tonight's game isn't the foundation of the complaint that the team is soft and prioritized a win over a response to the hit. It's the response (or lack thereof) that leads to the complaint. The hit exists separately from the response, so I don't see how the hit itself can be tied to the win. To elaborate, Dangles was hit regardless of what would happen afterward. The team could have responded and still won, then would there be a complaint? I'm sure someone would find a way to complain about it. If the team had lost (without responding), then they'd be accused of being twice as soft because no one responded to the hit on Dangles and the episode caused them to mentally crumple. If the team responded and then lost, then someone would complain that the team should have let winning the game be the response. And what if one of our softies was injured while responding, or someone did something dumb to be suspended, or both - which is highly likely, frankly. Now someone would complain that winning should have been the response and that Lindy must be losing his mind because he sacrificed players X and Y in addition to Dangles for a culture-building exercise ("whatever that is," the complainant would interject) when they need wins badly.
-
Doug Allen to sing the Anthems before the Sabres-Nashville Game 1/31/25
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
Intolerance is a sphere, not a one-way street. -
Doug Allen to sing the Anthems before the Sabres-Nashville Game 1/31/25
... replied to Brawndo's topic in The Aud Club
Over the top? Like your post? Wow. -
Was on X and saw that we may be winning this game. Woo.
-
GDT: Penguins @ Sabres, Jan 17, 2025 - 7:00PM, MSG πΊ, WGR550 π» π
... replied to LGR4GM's topic in The Aud Club
-
Oh, look, maybe we can get him back! Surely there is a cohort here who would not protest.
-
GDT: Carolina @ Buffalo, 1/15/2025, 6 pm ET, TNT, truTV, MAX
... replied to Doohicksie's topic in The Aud Club
That's a fanciful revisionist view of Meatball's teams. Meatballs ruined the core by not focusing on defense. I agree with Hamsammich that when they play the way Ruff wants them to they are highly competitive. Ruff used the timeout to remind them how to play and the Canes didn't stand a chance in those last three minutes. -
GDT: Carolina @ Buffalo, 1/15/2025, 6 pm ET, TNT, truTV, MAX
... replied to Doohicksie's topic in The Aud Club