SwampD

That absolutely is going to happen.

No. It almost happened tonight. No All the kids do. Power can't even legally drink the pain away. I feel like the rest of the season is going to be like this, especially without Tuch. They will definitely get some more big wins, but I see them getting blown out a lot as well.

😂

I'd be mad at no penalties if I thought we had a PP that would score.

Yes.

Where did Tage go?

Hooking,… … mmmm, K.

I think the kids are shot.

Playoffs would have been a bonus this year. This is the team we knew we were getting.

My kingdom for some play in the Dallas zone.

Marty quoting the rulebook as if it matters. That's funny.

I like him.

😂

Yes!!!!

The Sabres are better when they hit. Why aren't they hitting? *****in pussies.

Nothing I focus on has any relevance to whether or not the Sabres win.

(i) When the puck has been directed, batted or thrown into the net by an attacking player other than with a stick. When this occurs, if it is deemed to be done deliberately, then the decision shall be NO GOAL. A goal cannot be scored when the puck has been deliberately batted with any part of the attacking player’s body into the net. It was deliberate.

But you are wrong.

I think it's weird, but not disgusting.

I never said it was the reason they lost the game. I said that as per the rule, Toronto got the call wrong, because they did.

This is just fantastic. Seriously.

Loved the Tralf!

It absolutely is the issue, and if you are going to tell people that they need eye exams, then I am going to tell you that you need to re-read and learn the rule. If he intentionally raised his leg to make contact with the puck and then it went into the net, it is no goal. Period. It doesn't matter if he didn't propel the puck into the net. A distinct kicking motion is irrelevant. You can only intentionally redirect a puck in with your stick. Sorry, you are just wrong on this.

Are saying that he did not intentionally lift his leg in order for it to make contact with the puck?