spndnchz

I love how Vanek on his second goal knocks Subbans stick out of the way just far enough so that he can get by Subban and then take the pass from Ennis. Secondly, is the winning that we're seeing right now from the Sabres a product of Rolston ideas or system not being known by the rest of the league. Just like Enroth was really good until he got solved by the NHL?

It was interesting to see at the end of the game when James Patrick was passing the whiteboard across the bench and was holding it right in front of Rolston and Rolston just kept his hands down. Patrick pulls the whiteboard back and passes it again to Kevyn Adams.

How about we just eliminate him. Why bring in someone for him? Get rid of him AND someone else and bring in a new guy.

At least a few games ago for the glasses. Nice game Sabres. BTW that goal is in Leo not Myers. Leo over pursued. Myers was in the right spot. Leo should have been 15 feet East.

Lagunitas IPA. Cute bottle.

From Jesse Spector: Since Shanahan took over the Department of Player Safety last season, the NHL has issued no suspensions to any Devils, but three to Rangers (Andre Deveaux, Carl Hagelin, and Brandon Prust), two to Blues (Ian Cole and Chris Stewart), and two to Red Wings (Kyle Quincey and Brendan Smith). In addition to the Devils, no members of the Los Angeles Kings, Tampa Bay Lightning, or Winnipeg Jets have been suspended under Shanahan’s reign — although all four suspension-free teams have had players fined. The real question, though, is why Shanahan has failed to take any disciplinary action whatsoever against the Hartford Whalers, the only team for which he had a shorter tenure than the Rangers. Serious conflict of interest allegations, indeed.

Wouldn't want him to get hurt before the trade.

Two games for Edler and none for Lucic. That's fair.

Posting in the right thread I win by tiebreaker. :D

Don't worry. I won't even gOOgle wtf Dzeko is.

Lupul chimes in....

Hands in your pockets again?

http://youtu.be/MaTbO3cXQS4 Hearing

My point is you can't just stop paying a player when they get hurt. For the players it's about choice. Sure, something like 70% currently wear visors and the vote over the summer will probably make them mandatory but... Would you stop paying a player because now, with their mandatory visor, they still get clipped in the eye because they held their head wrong? Should've known? Wasn't looking? Lazy? Give me a list of avoidable risks. Next thing you know fighting is banned and they're all skating around in knight outfits.

We need a Zhitnik alert. You know, like an Amber Alert.

This has to be sarcasm. So the next time you fall down the stairs at work you can't collect workers comp because you were too lazy to tie your shoelace? Get real.

As I sit here typing my puppy (of 8 years) came over and gave me a nose nudge to pet him. I've lost two dogs growing up and neither one was easy. I really hope you find him, one way or another. Saying a prayer for you.

Do you have chronic inflammation?

I'll have to digest what I saw tonight. I'll get back to you soon. Overall this was a team I always wanted.

Haha. Walking into F'NC and they're playing "Rumor has it"

Did you notice he has a different pair of glasses since he started here? They used to be half rim now he's got the full rim job.

Nah. I just call the box office and they print me shiny new ones. :thumbsup:

It's a matter of choice. Visors are great but the players still want the choice to be theirs or at least the rule to be made by them and not The Man.

Alright fine. After talking with some friends, I'm going tonight.

Depends. Would you rather be knocked out or spend a night in jail?