spndnchz

No Pominville for the WIld tonight.

With a tree in the front yard! AhHaHaHa Look behind you!

With a roof?

Do you live in a brick house with steps in front?

Wow you guys are paranoid. It was just the first thing that came to mind for a conspiracy. I guess I'm bad at those. To answer the IP question, anywhere you go on the interwebs your IP can be seen and cookies are handed out. This site is not sharing any of that information with anyone.

We don't have one. Funny, my little niece asked me what a "dial tone" was once.

I didn't click any of the links you posted. I rarely do. I could give two shits where you people are from. :w00t: If you are a fan, you're here. I love you all.

Don't love it. Suffer it.

He's not capable of an independent thought. He wanted to write a captive audience piece and needed some material. I laugh as I write "material" because usually he just copies and pastes from his last 5-6 years. That was in reference to the recent Roy-Ott trade.

Not sure where all this comes from. Is there some sort of witch hunt I'm missing?

He kicked it, so No.

I think part of what he's saying is that they tried to just add a piece here and a piece there. What became of the team was a mess of similar talent not blended together correctly. By trying to just make the playoffs by adding pieces, some that worked some that didn't, the team was never great. IMO he's looking at year 2 or 3 for the team to come together maybe sooner if other teams cooperate. lol Start with the new core group. Get players that are around the same age to grow together, add some veterans in year two and be competing for a Cup in year three.

He thinks you work for the Sabres. Maybe you scout the Stars for them lol.

ROFLMAO http://youtu.be/j3qMfsqn93s

Well, they had already picked the team. They do it beforehand with "auditors" or whatever you want to call them so there's no shenanigans.

Yes!

Another clown post.

Sarcasm reeks.

http://twitter.com/hockeynight

Hate to say it, but Bettman.

That's a clown question bro.

And for Chicago, No Toews No Kane No Seabrook?

Darcy's sarcastic reference to tanking was in reference to REALLY tanking. Long term tanking. You think the Pens win with just Crosby? No Staal No Fleury? No Malkin?

I'm not defending Regier. Just taking the seeds out of the weed. (which I will trade for draft picks)

2003- 5th Pitt gets Fleury 2004-13th Pitt gets Malkin 2005 13th Pitt gets Crosby 2006-24th Chicago 3rd pick-Toews, Pitt gets Staal 2007-31st pick Chicago gets kane Same chance?