MattPie

I mean Buckley. We're gonna get sued. There's lots of reasons to doubt Rex, but the decisions of the front office before he was part of the organ-i-zation isn't really one of them.

You're thinking of Rugger.

The flat tax seems to make sense and I was almost going to say I like it, but let's be honest: the reason the IRS is complex isn't flat vs. progressive. I haven't seen them in awhile, but there used to be a big chart in the tax paperwork that said, "if your taxable income falls into this range, this is your tax burden". Flat vs. progressive doesn't change that too much, all they'd have to do is create a table (or calculator app) that does the same, you look up how much you make and send in whatever the difference is between what you've already paid and that number. The reason the IRS is complex is the US tries to use taxes to reduce the burden for people for doing certain things. For instance, I get a tax break for having a dependent (my daughter) because the government realizes that having a kid is expensive and generally positive for the country. The US has decided that home ownership is a good thing, so I get a break on the interest that I pay on my mortgage. The list goes on; donating to charities, solar panels, energy efficient appliances, etc. I'm not saying that's an ideal thing, but that's why the system is the way it is. If you go to a flat tax or straight progressive tax (no deductions), some positive things the IRS brings goes away. I'd consider a straight progressive tax on one condition: since companies can have religious beliefs now (apparently), they can pay that same straight tax as me. No writing off depreciation, no writing off anything. They get taxed on their gross income just like me.

Some mild advice: I kept most of my text books, and never looked at them again. And that was mostly before having access to a fair bit of the world's knowledge in a computer in my pocket. I donated them a few years ago hoping someone would get some use out of them.

A two-pack of pixie sticks a day habit.

Top right corner: man these "seat" costumes we rented look great, you can't even tell we're here!

Jack be nimble, Jack be quick, way better call than Yeichel, Rick! :ph34r:

Maybe this was covered, but perhaps he should describe how he's going to make up the 46% of the taxes that come from personal income.

SAMSON HART WILL BE REIN.

Confirmation bias is real, and I'm susceptible to it as anyone else. I see it most of the time when I'm shopping for something. If I start out with "I think I want *this*" but want to do research to make sure, I often end up comparing other items to the first and then finding reasons that I like the first better. Or when there is a flaw, "well, that doesn't matter that much to me". Realtors know all about this and have a "formula" on how to show the houses they think you'll like (or they want to sell) at the right time in the process so you get attached to it.

I'd be shocked if Sanders wasn't ahead of Clinton in NH, considering where he's from. I'm surprised the gap is that close unless there's a serious VT/NH rivalry that I don't know about. Eastside, you bring a lot of information to the discussion, but you come off (to me, at least) as a "True Believer". You tend to spin anything that's even mildly negative about Sanders with either "that's not true" or "but that means it doesn't matter". Sanders has flaws, everyone does. I think he'd be great for this country, I'm a fan. But you really "need" (as much as anyone needs to listen to me on an internet politics discussion) to at least try to accept other facts before you argue them.

So we're just going to refer to Eichel as "The Pick" now? I can't believe you wouldn't want to know where he is.

Can we start calling the goal light a Jack-o-lantern yet?

Duff does a long, gutteral "SCOOOORRRREEEEESSSSSS!"

That's cliché, paint on the hood of that VW.

Well, that sucks. I wish her a speedy recovery with no lasting effects.

On the radio call, I think he was mentioned as part of a great PK in the 1st (the NBC guys were probably talking about player sock rituals), but I don't recall anything later. I wasn't paying that much attention though.

Maybe one of our Swedish friends will pipe up, but this is what (I think) we're talking about: http://www.food.com/recipe/oven-baked-swedish-bacon-pancake-flaskpannkaka-504569 I've been meaning to try it since I read the books last year. Looks relatively easy to make...

Knee. :) Essentially, net neutrality centers around ISPs charging companies for not so much access, but at least being in the "fast lane". Essentially, give us money and we'll prioritize your traffic. So if you're Headline News Network, you can pay big money. If you're the new Neo News Network, you're in the "slow lane" and your pages are slower than HNN's. How long before people get tired of "NNN's slow website" and move on? I'm in the IT biz, so I somewhat understand where the network people are coming from. There are legitimate reasons to shape traffic and prioritize certain protocols over others. They get upset because they see companies like Netflix and NHL Gamecenter :) taking up huge amounts of their bandwidth without them getting a cut of the action. But, I think priotization has to stop at the protocol level. I think you can prioritize voice traffic over http or ftp, but I don't think you should be able to prioritize Comcast Streaming Service over Netflix. Not too long ago, Netflix was terrible on certain ISPs. This article is interesting: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/02/netflix-performance-on-verizon-and-comcast-has-been-dropping-for-months/ Essentially, I want my internet connection to give equal access (from a network perspective) to any website or service I choose to view. In this case, capitalism falls down because it's easy to say, "well, if there's a demand someone will provide it" but in my area even though I'm lucky enough to have a choice in Broadband ISPs (Verizon FIOS and Comcast Cable), both are trying to overturn Net Neutrality rules so I don't actually have a choice in the matter. Most people don't have a choice of ISP so in effect, their ISP can determine what services work well for them and which don't. In an extreme case (and I'm not sure this would happen), they could block a service entirely.

Any big names? Motet? Lettuce?

Driving yourself to the race track in Imola, Italy.

It almost has to be, right? The only forces that don't want Net Neutrality are those that own the networks and maybe the knee-jerk "No government regulation ever!" crowd. The networks don't want it because they can make a ton of money on it (and have the means to "influence" candidates). I understand the anti-regulation crowd's stance, but I feel like the internet, and by extension Information, is too important to go to the highest bidder.

You know someone wants to run the numbers on the ratio of teams played to number of games played.

I think the latter is the largest part. Even with the recent moderate success, the Sabres still aren't a good team. The more time a play is on the ice, generally speaking, the worse his +/- is going to be. Weber's number is surprisingly good, but fewer games helps.

I think Bunghole Bugle is available though.