MattPie

Hey, we gave up a sixth round pick for Ullmark. :) FWIW, let's not forget Legwand came over in that trade too. I'm not sure that makes up the value, but bringing in a decent veteran forward isn't the worst thing in the world.

A> Park in front of a large glass window. B> Put something heavy on the brake pedal and go check. If that doesn't work, put something between the seat and the pedal and slide the seat up.u C> Modern tech edition: prop your phone up behind the car and record a video.

Heh, I hum that song whenever I see that option.

There are a couple Movie Taverns around here. Maybe not the same atmosphere, but the same concept.

I was wondering how long it had been since a D hat trick, thanks.

Unfortunately it's at least the 3rd time he's had to write it here. Some people can't conceptualize that morals don't have to come from religion.

And yet I saw a FB post about from a prominent Republican saying Obama is wrong (I think that's on a macro that starts every Republican post) and the Federal Government needs to reduce it's influence on education and leave it to the State and Local government. Which is exactly what this Bill (now Law) does. :wallbash: I'm meh about the thing. Tying funding to scores didn't seem to work out, but at the same time I'm not thrilled with the idea that states can (to a degree) teach whatever they want. I'd much rather all Americans start from the same educational play book (as much of a minefield as that statement is). Those examples of Southern textbooks calling Slaves "migrant workers" or something is ridiculous. LIke this: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2010/0519/Texas-textbook-war-Slavery-or-Atlantic-triangular-trade

Dude, lighten up. (I'm joking a bit, but seriously, you made a moderately distasteful joke, he called you on it, that's it; you don't need to get all offended that someone didn't like what you said)

And Johnson is playing too, it is backup Thursday.

Hey, I'm an optimist. :)

He obviously doesn't have contact with his father, I wonder if he keeps in touch with his mother though.

Bruins, Wild, Oilers, or Islanders, too. :) I will say the "JetBlues" are pretty attractive, although probably too close to he actual Jets sweater. I'd like to see it with the lighter blue replaced with Panthers red (even though I really dig that blue on blue look).

I'm confused: "As it has been explained to me, expect a circular logo (like the Blackhawks)". Like this?!?

The new owner may not relish the idea of coming in and saying, "I want to thank the City of Buffalo and the fans for the warm welcome you've given me, it's truly an honor to be part of Sabres history, and my goal is to win another 3 Stanley Cups as owner. By the way, I don't have $3B sitting around, so effective today ticket prices go up by 20% to get back to 95% of the league average. I'm sure you all understand, I have to run a tighter ship."

It's all over the news, but the American Atheists put a billboard in NC and CO that says, "Go ahead and skip church. Just be good for goodness sake, Happy Holidays". That pretty much nails it for me, I don't think a higher power is needed to tell right from wrong, just common sense and compassion.

I honestly believe Pegula is looking at the long game. For whatever reason, he my have to make an exit at some point. If he leaves behind a team that's spending well past it's income it's a less attractive business investment for a new owner, meaning the team would have to be taken on by another owner that wants to spend his own money keeping the team afloat. The pool of billionaire hockey fans in Buffalo is pretty small, there are far more in other cities with no particular reason to keep the team where it is. Keep the team at least near even and I'm confident Buffalo will find someone to buy it. Besides, the tickets go directly to revenue, which determines the salary cap, which determines how much money Pegula can throw around to get the right players in here.

Only on a plane. That was their Friday the 13th.

Funny, that Kenyan Muslim seems to have a better grasp on the US Constitution that Trump does. :) Side note: I learned today that in parts of England, trump == fart (presumably a shortened version of trumpet).

I love the exchange between Tim Peel and Fake Tim Peel.

Thank you for your well thought-out contribution.

Ahem, Lehner. :)

Didn't the Sabres gave up 4 when the Canes pulled the goalie with 5 minutes left like 1997 or something? Luckily the Sabres were up 5-0 to start.

Speaking of Excessive Mullets, this is a a classic:

C is for Cookie, that's good enough for me.

Interesting, I'd think third parties don't exist due to the "winner take all" elections in the US. Generally speaking, any third party will appeal more to people that lean towards one of the two big parties, so third parties only serve to damage "the cause" by syphoning off voters and the other big party prevails. See: Ross Perot. In more contemporary terms, I could see Trump running as a third party candidate and sucking off 15-20% of the Republican vote, but very little of the Democratic vote. The election would be a landslide in the electoral college as even the "red" states you end up with numbers like 45% D, 35% R, 20% T.