MattPie

USA today's business model never included human beings as subscribers. As far as I can tell, it's based on spamming people via hotel room doors, largely with fluff pieces. I have to think most of their revenue comes from the contracts with big businesses to provide X number of papers per day to their location, and turning around and saying advertise with us, we have the largest circulation in the US. I'd call it a market niche, as it's unlikely that most other papers could use the model without being on the same scale. Did you note the article above that Facebook and Google have driven down the ad payout so far that places like the NYT aren't making enough on it to make it worthwhile? 20000 clicks only pays like $100; TBN is never going to get the clicks to make that sustainable.

WGRZ still gets money from their traditional product, selling viewer eyeballs to advertisers. They can put up some basic content on the web without hurting their model, and at this point, I don't think they've really been hit by cord cutting (and even then, they still broadcast so they're better off than someone like TBS or USA network). A Newspaper's business model is getting text-based information to people for a nominal cost, somewhat buoyed by selling ad space. Physical Newspaper subscribers are down, so ad space goes becomes less valuable as well, and revenue goes down too. They either need to reinvent themselves as something that people will subscribe to (either online of off), or they'll eventually die out. Online has the advantage that they don't necessarily need to produce something every day to sell papers, so they can spend the time on the "good" stuff. The Buffalo star seems to be taking that path so the don't have to pay people to create a bunch of fluff every day.

It looks like it is originally named Eliajh's Chair, but there's another book of that name so maybe it was published in English under a new name. Strange.

A shot at getting paid to play hockey with a bunch of NHL guys for a couple weeks? Absolutely.

Great book, along with Armada by the same author. I think I mentioned it somewhere in this thread when I read it originally.

Finished up The Princess Bride the other day; never really thought to read it before Amazon advertised it to me as a free for Prime members. iThe screenplay follows the flow and tone of the book very closely (which makes sense as the author wrote both), so if you liked the movie the book is worth a read. Hey NS, have you read "The Judgment of Richard Richter" by Igor Stiks (accent on S omitted)? It caught my eye as it's set in Sarajevo. I haven't started it yet, and I have no idea what to expect.

You kids! I was in high school the FOUR years the Bills went to the Superbowl. Your mark is meaningless! (Am I doing this right?)

In the first two rounds, I forgot to add. I didn't go any further.

FWIW, 6 Pro-bowl DBs were taken after Vince Young in 2006.

I agree. Sometimes it isn't a matter of will the player adapt, but *can* they adapt. Darien Hatcher would never be a mobile, puck moving defenseman. Tyler Ennis will never be a power forward.

It's possible. I'd go download Wireshark and do a packet capture to see what's going out over the wire, that will be fairly definitive. Plus, you're a software person right? Wireshark may be one of *the* most important tools for diagnosing network issues with software. Apps and logs lie, the wire doesn't. PM me and I can help some if needed. Edit: Also, keep an eye on https://www.packtpub.com/packt/offers/free-learning. They offer free ebooks daily, a couple of which are Wireshark-related, and almost all of them are software development themed.

Depends on how you spin it: Everyone has strong points and weak points, and no matter how hard you try sometimes things aren't a good fit. DB's system for D required good long-distance passing and surveying the entire ice to make that pass. Those seem like rather hard things to practice if your skills are weak there. If you're strong skills are rushing the puck and making good short passes (as we've seen with the Sabres, those can be harder than they look), Housley's system is (likely) to be good for you.

There's a lot of recency bias in here, and a few that I wouldn't have remembered without reading this thread. 1: Enroth 2. Horton 3. Psysk (right?) 4. Warrener 5. Lydman 6. Weber 7. Rick Martin, I guess, but not personal memory. 8. Did Selane wear 8? That's all I got. 9. Kane 10: Tallinder 11: Perrault 12. Jim Kelly 13. Sundin 14. Frank Reich 15. Eichel 16. LaFontaine 17. Foligno 18. Grosek (I think) 19. Hodgson 20. Nothing rings a bell. There's a Bill I'm thinking of but can't name. 21. Stafford 22. Mair 23. Drury 24. Nothing Rings a bell. (NRB) 25. Grier 26. Vanek 27. Peca 28. I wore this number in little league one year; we went undefeated and lost in the Championship game. I was a terrible baseball player. 29. Pominville 30. Miller 31. NRB 32. Ray 33. Wasn't there a D-man that recently wore this number? 34. Another recent D-man jumped into my head, but I can't name him so Thurman Thomas. 35. Vinz! 36. Barnaby 37. Curtis Brown 38. Kelso (I think) 39. Hasek 40. Lehner 41. Stuuuuuu Barnes! 42..Gerbe? (I use 42 or 314 when I have to number myself for stuff, like motorcycle track days or running) 43. NRB 44. Zhitnik 45. NRB 46. NRB 47. Bogo 48. Briere 49. NRB 50. Ray Bentley 51. Soupy 52. Rivet 53. NRB 54. Car, where are you? 55. Hecht 56. Talley 57. Myers 58. NRB 59. Grant 60. NRB 61. Max Afinagenov 62. NRB 63. Ennis 64. When I'm 65. NRB 66. NRB 67. NRB 68. NRB 69. Doug Glatt 70. Nylander? 71. NRB 72. NRB 73. NRB 74. McKee 75. NRB 76. Peters (Smerlas, honorable mention, but I may have that wrong). 77. Kulikov 78. Bruce Smith 79. NRB 80. James Lofton 81. Satan 82. Foligno 83. Andre Reed 84. The guy that wore it for Montreal, as it was the last number that hadn't been worn for Montreal. 85. NRB 86. NRB 87. Corsby 88. Metzelars 89. Tasker 90. ROR 91. NRB 92. NRB 93. Gilmore (only because I read it here) 94. NRB 95. Bailey (either one) 96. Leon Seals 97. McDavid 98. NRB 99. Gretzkey 00. Biron

There is evolutionary pressure to be afraid of what different than you; different means "not you" and "not you" isn't going to help you survive as they have the other "not youse" to look out for. It is one of those things that parents need to steer their kids out of; much like "don't beat someone up and steal their food".

Interesting, and makes sense. I'm not a big fan of FB, they all kinda taste like the lager (and I'm not a lager guy).

I'm looking forward to using "melon farmer" on someone. :)

The next one will be tougher: calling men various feminine things in a disparaging manner. I'll admit, "hit 'em with your purse Housley" makes me chuckle, but we're telling a boys that the worse thing to be is a woman. And telling women that only failed men act like them. I'm mad at myself whenever I read it.

All I know is after drinking several (admittedly several years ago), it occurred to the group I was with that they all tasted the same with slight variations. Some of their more recent IPAs even taste like lager to me, which makes me wonder if they don't mix Standard Saranac Beer #1 with something else 50/50 to make the varieties. I'd imagine some of the beers are distinct recipes, but some really do taste like lager with flavoring.

Saranac more or less brews the same beer and then adds flavor to it to make the varieties.

I think the monopoly guy or Wimpy from popeye, but I'd have to look. Oh Natty Boh.

Let's test this out: Smurfing Brett Hull. That smurf Koslov Kerry Fraiser royally smurfed us that game. Yep, I dig it.

Forget liger, I really like the idea of bringing smurf back. Only a smurfing liger would invent a new word when there's a perfectly good word that already exists.

Or someone new laid down the law about it.