shrader

I just saw this very minor trade on TSN. Can someone please translate this line for me:

I wasn't so great either, then I lucked my way into finding a job that worked closely with a couple of my professors from school. Do you have anyone like that who you can talk to? I'm completely convinced that the first "foot in the door" job out of college is completely about networking.

Are you finished with school or are you searching ahead of time?

I bet he was the mystery goalie too.

To be fair, it's a single quote pulled from an entire interview. I'm sure it fits much better when hearing the whole thing.

And that's the danger in twitter. Friedman could have said just about anything where those elipses are. Hell, the quote could very well be "Ristolainen's value is down from where they'd like it to be", but we get to cut up the quote to present whatever message we'd like.

It's all a part of baseball's evil scheme to finally throw significant punishments at pitchers who intentionally throw at batters. I love all the outrage from certain players who say the Astros were messing with their careers and livelihood. And throwing a 95 mph fastball at someone's head doesn't? The door's open to salvage something from this, baseball.

That's assuming they could have moved him for a second line center earlier. I'm not so sure that I believe that one.

I don't like the all or nothing approach on this one. I think getting to the conference is a pretty significant result. Those 4 teams have a big impact on the playoffs. Then again, that could just be years of built up Buffalo bias in me.

So does everyone get a neutral site game? I want no part of a short season where one team gets 8 home games and the other gets 9. I could live with that imbalance if it was baseball with their 2000 game schedule, but not here.

A tank that landed the owner. It saved the franchise, granted that was many years later.

Duct tape

Forgive me for speaking for Taro, but I repeat the question.

Stupid GIF. Homer states that Batman's a scientist. It wasn't a question.

That was one of the rides. It spins fast, the floor drops out, but you stick to the wall.

Pittsburgh probably isn't the greatest inspiration for this tongue in cheek comment...

Eklund's science blog needs to happen.

Late round picks out of eastern europe in the 80s weren't late round picks due to a lack of talent.

I don't remember the specifics at the time of the trade, but injuries also factor into this. I know there have been stretches this year were there were also a handful of guys on standard IR. Those count to the cap in full, there's no relief there. We can question the follow-up move all we want, but I think it's safe to assume that this trade was made in order to bring in Frolik. If this was done in the heart of that injury run, they very well could not have taken on a penny of salary. We can fault the GM all we want, but the blame for injuries can't be placed on mim. You're saying retaining salary for 30% of the season, but they traded Scandella with around half of the year left to go. So if you're suggesting they take on that money at that point, that's additional money to the cap and every penny adds up quickly when things are tight. Retaining money at that moment was going to bring on some significant limitations moving forward. It may very well have been too much. Now, should they have held onto him longer and potentially maximize the return? It's easy to answer that one today in a vaccuum and ignore all the variables. I want to wait and see how the deadline shakes out before I pass judgement on this one.

It was done in order to take Frolik. Yeah, I know you're suggesting that shouldn't have added him at all, but he wanted a forward and he more than likely couldn't retain money and add that forward.

The Sabres are up against the cap. Montreal is in the bottom 3rd. So there's more to the decision of taking on money than you're suggesting here. Also, if they take that money on then, they then can't take on any more in a later deal. So again, it's not as straightforward as you'd think.

It should be in the neighborhood of $1.5 million in total cap space that they used on Scandella for the entire season. I'm selectively rounding here, but he was with them for around a quarter of the season (so $1 million in cap space), and now they're taking on half of the cap hit for the remaining ~quarter of the season (so another $0.5 million in cap dollars). In terms of real dollars, they took on a little extra because his contract was backloaded and he's making more than $4 million this year. But whatever the exact numbers are, it's fairly low in exchange for moving a draft pick up 40 or so slots.

It does add up if that's the amount of space they needed. They have a decent chunk of money on LTIR and it was probably never about an exact balancing of the cap dollars. That and the maximum that LA could have taken back on the Toffoli deal was $2.3 million, so it does wind up coming pretty close to Schaller's figure.

If Zombieland has taught us anything, it's that you'd be far safer if you did have that three year supply of twinkies. Granted, things would be far less entertaining, but you would be safe.