Stop whining and put your analysis down for people to read and respond. "Darcy would have gotten more..." is neither analysis nor even remotely interesting. You didn't even bother to say how he would have gotten that, only that he "would have".
Of course, Darcy had a reputation for overvaluing his players and not making early trades until the market was set. So, logically it follows that the previous GM who overvalued his players and waited for the market would have gotten more than the Tim Murray who is being criticized for overvaluing his player and waiting too long. Or maybe Tim just didn't say please when asking for his 1st rounder?
We are all awaiting your details on what the true value was for these players, who the trading partners were and why they coveted our UFAs.