All Activity
- Past hour
-
This Leafs debacle.
-
Stutzle
-
If he was smart he did
-
Was wondering where Cozens was but used his speed to help create a goal I've been hard on Ullmark but he's on his game tonight. still a long way to go but wouldn't a leafs 3-0 choke be pretty sweet ?
-
Did the guy we traded cozens for retire as soon as he got here?
-
Cozens is playing a good game. Wish we got this version of him more frequently.
-
Cozens with a shorty. Good for him.
-
Cozens shorties makes it 2-0 Sens almost midway through the third
-
Cozens shortie! He was flying to make that a two on one. Nice finish. Good for him. Eff the leafs 😜
-
You can count on the Canes and Panthers to deliver playoff games worth watching. Especially the Panthers these past three seasons.
-
Ahh, thought you meant you thought Norris' high high end bursts would go down (as a percentage of his total time skating) and he'd end up in a percentage there closer to where McLeod ended up; not (as you actually did mean) that Norris' 20mph metrics would move up significantly. Thanks for the clarification.
-
Everybody except Zucker.
-
At least for 20 minutes. Oops!
-
Otters take a 1-0 lead after 2.
- Today
-
The first four games of this Leafs/Sens series were pretty good but neither team looks like they want it tonight.
-
Yes the numbers do not come down by playing more games. They only go up. With 23 more games Norris would most likely added enough 20 -22 mph and 18 -20 mph speed bursts to pass or get close to McLoud's numbers in those categories.
-
His top speed would NOT come down with more opportunities to reach it. If anything, he might've gone up to the 99th percentile for that. Not sure that the percentage of time that Norris was flying would necessarily come down too much. His sample size was 56. It's not like it was 5 or 6.
-
Devils aren't going away
- Yesterday
-
Weren’t there some metrics last year that showed every offseason addition as being high end speed?
-
He gained 4 yards by throwing an interception. That’s 3d chess right there. I don’t want to be disrespectful by calling it college radio, but I guess it would have been fine. Edit: Oops, I did call it that. I meant it as an analogy and didn’t realize it was fact.
-
So you cherry-picked three receivers to make a point and didn't think we'd look up the actual stats?
-
And yet they as scored the most points in the NFL. Some problem, huh? We scored 29 points in that game. But KC scored 32. Ergo...